Kaye Stephen B, Rao Prasad G, Smith Godfrey, Scott John A, Hoyles Sharon, Morton Clare E, Willoughby Colin, Batterbury Mark, Harvey Graham
St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jul;41(7):3192-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3192-3197.2003.
Identification of the causative organisms in suspected bacterial keratitis traditionally involves collecting multiple corneal scrapes, which are plated directly onto different solid agar culture media. Difficulties have been reported with this practice, so the development of a simpler diagnostic method in suspected bacterial keratitis would be useful. It is unclear whether a single corneal scrape sent to the microbiology laboratory in a liquid transport culture medium (indirect method) is as reliable for the diagnosis of bacterial keratitis as inoculation of multiple scrapes directly onto agar plates (direct method). To investigate this, bacterial recovery was assessed following transfer and transport of different concentrations and types of bacteria from an artificially contaminated surgical blade into brain heart infusion (BHI). Bacterial recovery rates between the proposed (indirect) and standard (direct) method were then compared after the in vitro inoculation of pig corneas and following specimen collection in patients with presumed bacterial ulcerative keratitis. Recovery of bacteria from contaminated surgical blades was found to be the same from both solid and liquid culture media. There was no significant difference in the numbers of positive cultures from solid (direct) and liquid (indirect) culture media, both in the experimental pig cornea inoculation study (P = 0.34) and in experiments with patients with clinical infections (P = 0.4), with an 85.2% agreement between methods (kappa = 0.61, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, therefore, the collection of two corneal scrapes, one used for Gram staining and the other transported in BHI followed by plating and subculturing in an enrichment medium, provides a simple method for the investigation of presumed bacterial keratitis.
传统上,在疑似细菌性角膜炎中鉴定致病微生物需要采集多次角膜刮片,然后直接接种到不同的固体琼脂培养基上。据报道,这种做法存在困难,因此开发一种更简单的疑似细菌性角膜炎诊断方法将很有用。目前尚不清楚,将单次角膜刮片置于液体转运培养基中送至微生物实验室(间接方法),对于细菌性角膜炎的诊断是否与将多次刮片直接接种到琼脂平板上(直接方法)一样可靠。为了对此进行研究,我们评估了将不同浓度和类型的细菌从人工污染的手术刀片转移并转运至脑心浸液(BHI)后细菌的回收率。然后,在对猪角膜进行体外接种以及对疑似细菌性溃疡性角膜炎患者进行标本采集后,比较了建议的(间接)方法和标准的(直接)方法之间的细菌回收率。结果发现,从污染的手术刀片中回收细菌,在固体和液体培养基中是相同的。在实验性猪角膜接种研究中(P = 0.34)以及在临床感染患者的实验中(P = 0.4),固体(直接)和液体(间接)培养基的阳性培养物数量没有显著差异,两种方法之间的一致性为85.2%(kappa = 0.61,P < 0.0001)。因此,总而言之,采集两次角膜刮片,一次用于革兰氏染色,另一次置于BHI中转运,随后接种并在富集培养基中传代培养,为疑似细菌性角膜炎的研究提供了一种简单的方法。