Ganis G, Kosslyn S M, Stose S, Thompson W L, Yurgelun-Todd D A
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Aug;13(8):830-6. doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.8.830.
Deception is a complex cognitive activity, and different types of lies could arise from different neural systems. We investigated this possibility by first classifying lies according to two dimensions, whether they fit into a coherent story and whether they were previously memorized. fMRI revealed that well-rehearsed lies that fit into a coherent story elicit more activation in right anterior frontal cortices than spontaneous lies that do not fit into a story, whereas the opposite pattern occurs in the anterior cingulate and in posterior visual cortex. Furthermore, both types of lies elicited more activation than telling the truth in anterior prefrontal cortices (bilaterally), the parahippocampal gyrus (bilaterally), the right precuneus, and the left cerebellum. At least in part, distinct neural networks support different types of deception.
欺骗是一种复杂的认知活动,不同类型的谎言可能源于不同的神经系统。我们通过首先根据两个维度对谎言进行分类来研究这种可能性,这两个维度分别是谎言是否符合一个连贯的故事以及它们是否是预先记忆的。功能磁共振成像显示,与不符合故事的自发谎言相比,符合连贯故事的精心排练的谎言在右前额叶皮层引发更多激活,而在前扣带回和后视觉皮层则出现相反的模式。此外,与说实话相比,这两种类型的谎言在前额叶前皮质(双侧)、海马旁回(双侧)、右楔前叶和左小脑均引发更多激活。至少在一定程度上,不同的神经网络支持不同类型的欺骗行为。