Suppr超能文献

便携式静脉血凝血监测仪与中心实验室测定国际标准化比值的准确性比较

Accuracy of international normalized ratio determined by portable venous-blood coagulation monitor versus a central laboratory.

作者信息

Sirithunyanont Chirasak, Bhuripanyo Kiertijai, Kangkagate Charuwan, Winyarat Wiranee, Srichaya Panarat, Wangtip Kanokkwan

机构信息

Bangkok Heart Institute, Bangkok Hospital, Bangkok 10320, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 May;86 Suppl 1:S67-75.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The CoaguChek is a portable monitor unit for measuring the international normalized ratio (INR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of a portable prothrombin time (PT) monitor (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) compared with the laboratory method.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Paired venous blood INRs were performed in 220 consecutive outpatient tests mainly in anticoagulated (n = 210) and non-anticoagulated (n = 10) individuals. Accuracy was evaluated in 220 tests by parallel assessment of INRs (CoaquChek and laboratory). Accuracy was determined using statistic regression analysis and clinical agreement (expanded and narrow criteria). Agreement in dual INR measurement also was evaluated as a function of increasing INR.

RESULTS

The CoaguChek significantly correlated with the laboratory measurement (r = 0.89). The proportion of dual INR measurements that satisfied the clinical relevant expanded, and narrow agreement criteria was 90 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Eighty-two per cent of all dual measurements were within 0.5 INR units. The accuracy of the portable monitor was greatest for INR values less than 3.0; above this INR level the portable monitor overestimated laboratory INR values.

CONCLUSIONS

The CoaguChek is an accurate alternative to laboratory assessment of INR at values < 3.0. The authors suggest the use of the monitor in non anticoagulated patients or anticoagulated patients at values less than 3, as most physicians in Thailand prefer lower INR than in Western countries.

摘要

背景

CoaguChek是一种用于测量国际标准化比值(INR)的便携式监测仪。本研究的目的是评估便携式凝血酶原时间(PT)监测仪(CoaguChek,罗氏诊断公司,德国曼海姆)与实验室检测方法相比的准确性。

材料与方法

对220例连续门诊患者进行配对静脉血INR检测,主要包括抗凝患者(n = 210)和非抗凝患者(n = 10)。通过对INR(CoaguChek和实验室检测结果)进行平行评估,在220次检测中评估准确性。使用统计回归分析和临床一致性(宽松和严格标准)来确定准确性。还根据INR升高情况评估了双重INR测量的一致性。

结果

CoaguChek与实验室测量结果显著相关(r = 0.89)。满足临床相关宽松和严格一致性标准的双重INR测量比例分别为90%和86%。所有双重测量中有82%在0.5个INR单位以内。对于INR值小于3.0的情况,便携式监测仪的准确性最高;高于此INR水平时,便携式监测仪高估了实验室INR值。

结论

对于INR值<3.0的情况,CoaguChek是实验室评估INR的准确替代方法。作者建议在非抗凝患者或INR值小于3的抗凝患者中使用该监测仪,因为泰国的大多数医生比西方国家的医生更喜欢较低的INR值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验