Barchiesi F, Giacometti A, Arzeni D, Branchesi P, Crescenzi G, Ancarani F, Scalise G
Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Ancona, Italy.
J Chemother. 1992 Dec;4(6):381-6. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1992.11739196.
In our study 77 AIDS patients suffering from oral and/or esophageal candidiasis were evaluated: 38 received fluconazole, 39 ketoconazole. We analyzed the rates of clinical and mycological responses, relapses and toxicities. In vitro susceptibility tests for both antifungal drugs were performed by evaluating their Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs). The azole drugs investigated show a good activity in the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis also in advanced stages of HIV infection. Clinical cure or improvement were achieved in 29 (76.3%) and 31 (79.4%) of the patients treated with fluconazole or ketoconazole respectively. Clinical or laboratory adverse experiences related to fluconazole were seen in 7 (21.2%) patients while ketoconazole provoked adverse experiences in 9 (26.4%) patients. In vitro susceptibility tests, if repeated more than once, both in primary infection and relapses, could be important to demonstrate a probable sensitivity change or resistance of the tested strains.
在我们的研究中,对77例患有口腔和/或食管念珠菌病的艾滋病患者进行了评估:38例接受氟康唑治疗,39例接受酮康唑治疗。我们分析了临床和真菌学反应率、复发率和毒性。通过评估两种抗真菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)进行体外药敏试验。所研究的唑类药物在治疗HIV感染晚期的口咽和食管念珠菌病方面也显示出良好的活性。接受氟康唑或酮康唑治疗的患者中,分别有29例(76.3%)和31例(79.4%)实现了临床治愈或改善。7例(21.2%)接受氟康唑治疗的患者出现了与氟康唑相关的临床或实验室不良事件,而酮康唑在9例(26.4%)患者中引发了不良事件。在原发性感染和复发中,如果多次重复进行体外药敏试验,对于证明受试菌株可能的敏感性变化或耐药性可能很重要。