Ghannoum M A, Rex J H, Galgiani J N
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Mar;34(3):489-95. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.489-495.1996.
In summary, it is clear that in vitro susceptibility testing can predict outcome in selected clinical situations. The clearest data are from the fluconazole-treated AIDS patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. In this setting, the homogeneity of the underlying immune defect, combined with the ease of identification and monitoring of the infection, creates a near-perfect test situation. In more complex scenarios, such as the heterogeneous population of patients enrolled in a recent study of candidemia, no such clear-cut correlation was present. The importance of host factors in the correlation of the MIC with outcome cannot be overemphasized. Examples of these parameters include patient status (underlying disease, the presence of intravascular catheters, and CD4+ T-cell number), drug pharmacokinetics (absorption and distribution), patient compliance, and drug-drug interactions. Identification of relevant factors can substantially improve the degree of the MIC-outcome correlation and thus improve the clinical utility of in vitro testing. An important feature in this entire process is the role of standardized susceptibility testing procedures. While not without flaws, the proposed NCCLS reference method has been invaluable in allowing multiple investigators to contribute data that can be used to clarify the correlation between the fluconazole MIC and outcome. While the development of simplified second-generation methods is eagerly anticipated, the role of the reference method as a common touchstone is critical. Only by use of either the reference method itself or methods with a known relationship to the reference method can this broad collaborative process really proceed. Current work is focusing on defining interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida species, refinement of the in vitro procedures used to measure susceptibility to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, and itraconazole, and the acquisition of a broad base of data on the relationship between the MIC and outcome for these three drugs. Although considerable work remains to be done, the available data suggest that solutions to each of these problems are possible and that routine susceptibility testing of fungi will become meaningful for clinical decision making in the foreseeable future.
总之,很明显体外药敏试验能够在特定临床情况下预测治疗结果。最明确的数据来自接受氟康唑治疗的患有口腔念珠菌病的艾滋病患者。在此情形下,潜在免疫缺陷的同质性,加上感染易于识别和监测,营造了近乎完美的试验条件。在更复杂的情况下,比如近期一项念珠菌血症研究中纳入的异质患者群体,就不存在如此明确的相关性。宿主因素在最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与治疗结果相关性中的重要性再怎么强调也不为过。这些参数的例子包括患者状态(基础疾病、血管内导管的存在以及CD4 + T细胞数量)、药物药代动力学(吸收和分布)、患者依从性以及药物相互作用。识别相关因素可大幅提高MIC与治疗结果的相关程度,从而提高体外试验的临床实用性。这一整个过程中的一个重要特征是标准化药敏试验程序的作用。虽然并非没有缺陷,但所提议的美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)参考方法在使多个研究者能够提供可用于阐明氟康唑MIC与治疗结果之间相关性的数据方面一直非常宝贵。虽然急切期待简化的第二代方法的开发,但参考方法作为共同试金石的作用至关重要。只有通过使用参考方法本身或与参考方法有已知关系的方法,这一广泛的协作过程才能真正推进。当前的工作集中在确定氟康唑和念珠菌属的解释性折点、完善用于测量对两性霉素B、酮康唑和伊曲康唑敏感性的体外程序,以及获取关于这三种药物的MIC与治疗结果之间关系的广泛数据基础。尽管仍有大量工作要做,但现有数据表明这些问题中的每一个都有可能找到解决方案,并且在可预见的未来,真菌的常规药敏试验对于临床决策将变得有意义。