• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:另一种观点

Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in children: another opinion.

作者信息

Lee Chien-Hsing, Lin Yu-Li

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int Surg. 2003 Apr-Jun;88(2):92-4.

PMID:12872902
Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a commonly performed procedure that is a safe alternative to conventional open appendectomy (OA). LA offers reduced parietal scarring, a shortened hospital stay, and an earlier return to normal activities. During a 13-month period (July 2001 to July 2002), data were collected regarding appendectomies performed in 113 children (<18 years) in our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to type of appendectomy received (OA, N = 59 versus LA, N = 54). The operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Operative time was similar in the OA and LA groups (1.20 +/- 0.46 versus 1.12 +/- 0.36 hours, respectively; P = 0.328). Patients receiving OA had significantly longer hospital stays than those receiving LA (4.69 +/- 3.45 versus 3.07 +/- 1.93 days, respectively; P = 0.002). The complication rate associated with OA was higher than that observed for LA (6.8% versus 3.5%), but this difference was not significant (P = 0.681). Patients receiving LA could begin drinking water earlier after surgery than postflatus OA patients (12-24 hours versus 3.2 days). The OA group had a higher rate of ruptured appendicitis than the LA group (13/59 versus 2/54), but similar rates of normal appendix was observed in both groups (13/59 versus 13/54). Three patients in the LA group were switched to OA. Although patients who underwent LA did not experience a significant decrease in complications compared with OA patients, they did have shorter hospital stays and postoperative NPO times. Therefore, LA seems to be a safe operation in children. It is ideal for overweight, adolescent females and patients in whom appendicitis is suspected. LA is not recommended for those with an appendiceal mass.

摘要

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)是一种常见的手术,是传统开放性阑尾切除术(OA)的安全替代方法。LA可减少腹壁瘢痕形成,缩短住院时间,并能更早恢复正常活动。在13个月期间(2001年7月至2002年7月),收集了我院113名18岁以下儿童阑尾切除术的数据。根据接受的阑尾切除术类型将患者分为两组(OA组,n = 59;LA组,n = 54)。比较两组的手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症。OA组和LA组的手术时间相似(分别为1.20±0.46小时和1.12±0.36小时;P = 0.328)。接受OA的患者住院时间明显长于接受LA的患者(分别为4.69±3.45天和3.07±1.93天;P = 0.002)。与OA相关的并发症发生率高于LA(6.8%对3.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.681)。接受LA的患者术后比排气后接受OA的患者更早开始饮水(12 - 24小时对3.2天)。OA组阑尾破裂率高于LA组(13/59对2/54),但两组正常阑尾的发生率相似(13/59对13/54)。LA组有3例患者转为OA手术。虽然与OA患者相比,接受LA的患者并发症没有显著减少,但他们的住院时间和术后禁食时间较短。因此,LA似乎是儿童的一种安全手术。它适用于超重、青春期女性以及疑似阑尾炎的患者。不推荐对阑尾有包块的患者进行LA手术。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in children: another opinion.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:另一种观点
Int Surg. 2003 Apr-Jun;88(2):92-4.
2
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
3
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
5
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India.印度西孟加拉邦的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比
Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(4):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00225.x.
7
Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜检查在复杂性阑尾炎中的疗效
Int J Surg. 2009 Jun;7(3):250-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
8
[Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children in a regional hospital in Israel].[以色列一家地区医院儿童开放性与腹腔镜阑尾切除术对比研究]
Harefuah. 2007 Mar;146(3):173-5, 248.
9
Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.对于伴有阑尾包块的急性阑尾炎患儿,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jul;40(7):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it?腹腔镜阑尾切除术:值得做吗?
Am Surg. 1994 Jan;60(1):30-4.

引用本文的文献

1
National trends in therapeutic approaches and outcomes for pediatric appendicitis: a Taiwanese nationwide cohort study.台湾地区全国性队列研究:儿童阑尾炎治疗方法及治疗结果的全国趋势
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Jul;31(7):647-51. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3718-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
The role of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric appendicitis: a survey of Polish pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜检查在小儿阑尾炎治疗中的作用:波兰小儿外科医生的一项调查
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr;10(1):101-6. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.47510. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve.
学习曲线之后的儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术
JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):447-52.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:2332例回顾性比较研究
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0699-8.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2006 Jan;243(1):17-27. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000193602.74417.14.
6
Pediatric laparoscopic surgery--Indian scenario.小儿腹腔镜手术——印度的情况
Indian J Pediatr. 2004 Dec;71(12):1121-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02829828.