Suppr超能文献

一种新型商用聚氨酯避孕套的临床破损、滑脱情况及可接受性:一项随机对照研究。

Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of a new commercial polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.

作者信息

Potter W D, de Villemeur Maxence

机构信息

Stapleford Scientific Services Limited, 3 Adcroft Piece, Stapleford, Cambridge CB2 5FD, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Contraception. 2003 Jul;68(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00075-1.

Abstract

Although latex remains the primary material for male condoms, a number of condoms made from synthetic materials have appeared in commercial markets in recent years. Published data on the safety and efficacy of these condoms is still limited, but nevertheless synthetic condoms do offer the user a wider choice and may encourage greater use of condoms for contraception and sexual transmitted infection prophylaxis. This paper reports on a study carried out in the Paris region of France on a new, commercial polyurethane condom marketed in Japan as Sagami Original and in Europe as Protex Original. A standard latex condom complying with the European standard for condoms (EN 600:1996) from the same manufacturer was used as the control in the study. The clinical breakage rate for the polyurethane condom was 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.4%) compared to 1.3% (95% confidence interval 0.6-2.2%) for the latex condom. The difference was not statistically significant (chi(2) = 1.9, p = 0.168). Clinically significant slippage (complete slippage of the condom off the penis) was 1.1% (95% confidence interval 0.5-1.9%) for the polyurethane condom, compared to 0.5% (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.2%) for the latex; a difference that again was not statistically significant (chi(2) = 1.783, p = 0.182). The polyurethane condom was therefore equivalent to the latex condom in terms of clinical failure rate.

摘要

尽管乳胶仍是男用避孕套的主要材料,但近年来市场上出现了一些由合成材料制成的避孕套。关于这些避孕套安全性和有效性的公开数据仍然有限,但合成避孕套确实为使用者提供了更广泛的选择,并可能促使更多人使用避孕套来避孕和预防性传播感染。本文报告了在法国巴黎地区对一种新型商用聚氨酯避孕套进行的一项研究,该避孕套在日本名为相模原创(Sagami Original),在欧洲名为保而防原创(Protex Original)。研究中使用了同一制造商生产的符合欧洲避孕套标准(EN 600:1996)的标准乳胶避孕套作为对照。聚氨酯避孕套的临床破裂率为0.6%(95%置信区间0.2 - 1.4%),而乳胶避孕套为1.3%(95%置信区间0.6 - 2.2%)。差异无统计学意义(卡方 = 1.9,p = 0.168)。聚氨酯避孕套临床上显著滑脱(避孕套从阴茎上完全滑脱)的发生率为1.1%(95%置信区间0.5 - 1.9%),乳胶避孕套为0.5%(95%置信区间0.2 - 1.2%);这一差异同样无统计学意义(卡方 = 1.783,p = 0.182)。因此,就临床失败率而言,聚氨酯避孕套与乳胶避孕套相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验