Suppr超能文献

针对无法给出同意的临终患者的新型研究同意程序。

Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent.

作者信息

Rees Elizabeth, Hardy Janet

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT.

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.198.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a process of advance consent to enable research to be undertaken in patients in the terminal phase.

DESIGN

Feasibility study of an advance consent process to support a randomised controlled trial of two antimuscarinic drugs (hyoscine hydrobromide and glycopyrronium bromide) in the management of noisy respirations associated with retained secretions ("death rattle").

SETTING

Palliative care wards in a major cancer centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients admitted to a palliative care ward who may develop "death rattle" and thus be eligible for randomisation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient accrual; acceptability of the consent process.

RESULTS

Of the 107 patients approached, 58 patients gave advance consent to participate in the study. Of these, 15 patients developed death rattle and were randomised to receive either hyoscine or glycopyrronium; 16 patients died elsewhere; 15 patients died on the palliative care wards but were not randomised; 12 patients are still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial assessment suggests that this is a workable consent process allowing research to be undertaken in patients who are unable to give consent at the time of randomisation. Patient accrual rates to date are lower than needed to recruit adequate numbers in the time allotted to answer the research question.

摘要

目的

制定一种预先同意程序,以便能够对终末期患者进行研究。

设计

对一种预先同意程序进行可行性研究,以支持一项关于两种抗毒蕈碱药物(氢溴酸东莨菪碱和格隆溴铵)治疗与分泌物潴留相关的呼吸杂音(“濒死喉鸣”)的随机对照试验。

地点

一家大型癌症中心的姑息治疗病房。

参与者

入住姑息治疗病房、可能出现“濒死喉鸣”并因此有资格参与随机分组的患者。

主要观察指标

患者入组情况;同意程序的可接受性。

结果

在接触的107例患者中,58例患者预先同意参与研究。其中,15例患者出现濒死喉鸣并被随机分组接受东莨菪碱或格隆溴铵治疗;16例患者在其他地方死亡;15例患者在姑息治疗病房死亡但未被随机分组;12例患者仍存活。

结论

初步评估表明,这是一个可行的同意程序,允许对随机分组时无法给出同意的患者进行研究。迄今为止的患者入组率低于在规定时间内招募足够数量患者以回答研究问题所需的比率。

相似文献

1
Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent.
BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.198.
3
A study comparing hyoscine hydrobromide and glycopyrrolate in the treatment of death rattle.
Palliat Med. 2001 Jul;15(4):329-36. doi: 10.1191/026921601678320313.
4
Hyoscine and glycopyrrolate for death rattle.
Palliat Med. 2002 Sep;16(5):449-50; author reply 450. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm601xx.
5
Atropine, hyoscine butylbromide, or scopolamine are equally effective for the treatment of death rattle in terminal care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jul;38(1):124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.007. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
7
Hyoscine vs glycopyrronium for drying respiratory secretions in dying patients.
Br J Community Nurs. 2005 Sep;10(9):421-4, 426. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2005.10.9.19688.
8
Audit of three antimuscarinic drugs for managing retained secretions.
Palliat Med. 2000 May;14(3):221-2. doi: 10.1191/026921600670188257.
10
Interventions for noisy breathing in patients near to death.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD005177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005177.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Medically assisted hydration for adults receiving palliative care.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 14;12(12):CD006273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006273.pub4.
4
On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Jan 6;43(1):137-156. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00240-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Quality of transition to end-of-life care for cancer patients in the intensive care unit.
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0059-7. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
9
Medically assisted hydration for adult palliative care patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 23;2014(4):CD006273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006273.pub3.
10
Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):259-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical issues on consent: some philosophical concerns.
J Med Ethics. 2002 Dec;28(6):377-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.6.377.
3
Consent for trials in palliative care.
Lancet. 2000 Dec;356 Suppl:s44. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)92030-0.
4
What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre?
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Mar;36(5):621-6. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00330-5.
5
Why are trials in palliative care so difficult?
Palliat Med. 2000 Jan;14(1):69-74. doi: 10.1191/026921600677940614.
7
Informed consent in medical research.
BMJ. 1998 Mar 28;316(7136):1000-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.1000.
8
Placebo-controlled trials in palliative care: the argument for.
Palliat Med. 1997 Sep;11(5):415-8. doi: 10.1177/026921639701100514.
9
Informed consent: the intricacies.
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1059-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1059.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验