Hoppin J A, Umbach D M, London S J, Alavanja M C R, Sandler D P
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2233, USA.
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;60(8):e3. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.8.e3.
Exposure to animals, their feeds, and by-products contribute to respiratory symptoms among farmers.
To investigate the role of animal exposures and wheeze, and to assess whether their impact differs among susceptible subgroups, including atopics, asthmatics, and smokers.
Using the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort of pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina enrolled in 1994-97, wheeze associated with animal production was evaluated and interactions among susceptible subgroups assessed. Logistic regression models were used to examine risk factors for wheeze in the past year among 20 468 farmers.
Individuals raising animals requiring direct contact had the highest odds ratios (OR) for wheeze (OR(dairy) = 1.26; OR(eggs) = 1.70). A significant dose response was observed for both the number of poultry and the number of livestock on the farm. Farmers who performed veterinary procedures on a daily basis had an OR of 1.51. The odds of wheeze associated with poultry production was greater among atopic than non-atopic individuals. Milking cows daily increased the odds of wheeze in all individuals, with the largest association observed among atopic asthmatic individuals. The impact of dairy, poultry, and egg production varied among smoking groups. Past smokers had the highest odds ratios, followed by never smokers, and then current smokers. The OR(eggs) was 2.88 among past smokers but only 1.46 for never smokers. The OR(eggs) for current smokers of 0.80 might reflect self selection of exposure among smokers.
Results are consistent with animal production and respiratory symptoms, and suggest that subgroups may respond differently to exposure.
接触动物、其饲料和副产品会导致农民出现呼吸道症状。
调查接触动物与喘息之间的关系,并评估其对包括特应性个体、哮喘患者和吸烟者在内的易感亚组的影响是否存在差异。
利用农业健康研究,该研究对1994 - 1997年爱荷华州和北卡罗来纳州的一组农药施用者进行了队列研究,评估了与动物生产相关的喘息情况,并评估了易感亚组之间的相互作用。使用逻辑回归模型检查20468名农民过去一年中喘息的危险因素。
饲养需要直接接触的动物的个体喘息的优势比(OR)最高(OR(奶牛)= 1.26;OR(鸡蛋)= 1.70)。农场中家禽数量和牲畜数量均观察到显著的剂量反应关系。每天进行兽医操作的农民的OR为1.51。与家禽生产相关的喘息几率在特应性个体中高于非特应性个体。每天挤奶会增加所有个体喘息的几率,在特应性哮喘个体中观察到的关联最大。奶牛、家禽和蛋类生产的影响在吸烟组中有所不同。既往吸烟者的优势比最高,其次是从不吸烟者,然后是当前吸烟者。既往吸烟者中OR(鸡蛋)为2.88,但从不吸烟者仅为1.46。当前吸烟者的OR(鸡蛋)为0.80,这可能反映了吸烟者中接触的自我选择。
结果与动物生产和呼吸道症状一致,并表明不同亚组对接触的反应可能不同。