Minkler Meredith, Blackwell Angela Glover, Thompson Mildred, Tamir Heather
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720-7360, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1210-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1210.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) increasingly is being recognized by health scholars and funders as a potent approach to collaboratively studying and acting to address health disparities. Emphasizing action as a critical part of the research process, CBPR is particularly consistent with the goals of "results oriented philanthropy" and of government funders who have become discouraged by the often modest to disappointing results of more traditional research and intervention efforts in many low income communities of color. Supporters of CBPR face challenging issues in the areas of partnership capacity and readiness, time requirements, funding flexibility, and evaluation. The authors suggest strategies for addressing such issues and make a case for increasing support of CBPR as an important tool for action-oriented and community-driven public health research.
基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)日益受到健康领域学者和资助者的认可,成为一种合作开展研究并采取行动以解决健康差异问题的有效方法。CBPR强调行动是研究过程的关键部分,这与“以结果为导向的慈善事业”目标以及政府资助者的目标特别契合,这些资助者对在许多低收入有色人种社区开展的更为传统的研究和干预努力所取得的往往较为有限或令人失望的结果感到灰心。CBPR的支持者在伙伴关系能力与准备情况、时间要求、资金灵活性和评估等方面面临具有挑战性的问题。作者提出了解决这些问题的策略,并论证了增加对CBPR的支持,使其成为面向行动和由社区驱动的公共卫生研究的重要工具的理由。