丙泊酚镇静对气道高反应性疾病患者术后支气管收缩的影响。 - Suppr | 超能文献

The effect of sedation with propofol on postoperative bronchoconstriction in patients with hyperactive airway disease.

作者信息

Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith O, Suter P M

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(8):498. doi: 10.1007/BF01708593.

DOI:10.1007/BF01708593

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

The effect of sedation with propofol on postoperative bronchoconstriction in patients with hyperactive airway disease.丙泊酚镇静对气道高反应性疾病患者术后支气管收缩的影响。

Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(8):498. doi: 10.1007/BF01708593.

2

Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.结肠镜检查的患者自控镇静：一项随机试验，比较丙泊酚和阿芬太尼的患者自控给药与医生给予的咪达唑仑和哌替啶。

Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):683-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41519.

3

A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine "sedato-analgesic cocktail" for sedation during ERCP.一项关于在ERCP期间单独使用丙泊酚与使用丙泊酚加咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和喷他佐辛“镇静镇痛合剂”进行镇静的随机对照试验。

Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):807-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966725.

4

A lack of evidence of superiority of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review.在机械通气的重症患者中，丙泊酚与咪达唑仑用于镇静的优越性缺乏证据：一项定性和定量的系统评价。

Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):975-83. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00033.

5

Recovery from sedation with remifentanil and propofol, compared with morphine and midazolam, for reduction in anterior shoulder dislocation.瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚与吗啡和咪达唑仑相比在减少前肩脱位复位中的镇静恢复。

Emerg Med J. 2011 Jan;28(1):6-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.067652. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

6

[Propofol versus midazolam. Long-term sedation in the intensive care unit].[丙泊酚与咪达唑仑。重症监护病房的长期镇静]

Anaesthesist. 1992 Jun;41(6):335-41.

7

The use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a comparison with midazolam.在急诊科使用异丙酚进行程序镇静和镇痛：与咪达唑仑的比较。

Emerg Med J. 2011 Oct;28(10):861-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.085019. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

8

Propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department: A study on efficacy and safety.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑用于急诊科程序性镇静的疗效与安全性研究

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May;35(5):692-696. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.075. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

9

Analogosedation during flexible bronchoscopy using a combination of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl - A retrospective analysis.使用咪达唑仑、丙泊酚和芬太尼联合进行可弯曲支气管镜检查时的模拟镇静——一项回顾性分析

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 12;12(4):e0175394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175394. eCollection 2017.

10

Propofol versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术后重症监护病房镇静中丙泊酚与咪达唑仑的比较。

Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1415-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199409000-00011.

本文引用的文献

1

Midazolam infusion for basal sedation in intensive care: absence of accumulation.重症监护中咪达唑仑输注用于基础镇静：无蓄积现象。

Intensive Care Med. 1988;15(1):37-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00255634.

2

The effect of sedation with propofol on postoperative bronchoconstriction in patients with hyperreactive airway disease.

Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(1):45-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01706426.