Suppr超能文献

为期两年的腹主动脉瘤急诊超声检查准确性及结果的前瞻性研究。

Prospective study of accuracy and outcome of emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm over two years.

作者信息

Tayal Vivek S, Graf Christian D, Gibbs Michael A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Box 32861, Charlotte, NC 28232, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):867-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00630.x.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Determination of the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is essential in the management of the symptomatic emergency department (ED) patient.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta (EUS-AA) by emergency physicians could accurately determine the presence of AAA and guide ED disposition.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study at an urban ED with more than 100,000 annual patient visits with consecutive patients enrolled over a two-year period. All patients suspected to have AAA underwent standard ED evaluation consisting of EUS-AA, followed by a confirmatory imaging study or laparotomy. AAA was defined as any measured diameter greater than 3 cm. Demographic data, results of confirmatory testing, and patient outcome were collected by retrospective review.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients had EUS-AA performed over a two-year period. The patient population had the following characteristics: average age 66 years, male 54%, hypertension 56%, coronary artery disease 39%, diabetes 22%, and peripheral vascular disease 14%. Confirmatory tests included radiology ultrasound, 28/125 (22%); abdominal computed tomography, 95/125 (76%); abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, 1/125 (1%); and laparotomy, 1/125 (1%). AAA was diagnosed in 29/125 (23%); of those, 27/29 patients had AAA on confirmatory testing. EUS-AA had 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 89.5 to 100), 98% specificity (95% CI = 92.8 to 99.8), 93% positive predictive value (27/29), and 100% negative predictive value (96/96). Admission rate for the study group overall was 70%. Immediate operative management was considered in 17 of 27 (63%) patients with AAA; ten patients were taken to the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-AA in a symptomatic population for AAA is sensitive and specific. These data suggest that the presence of AAA on EUS-AA should guide urgent consultation. Emergency physicians were able to exclude AAA regardless of disposition from the ED.

摘要

未标注

对于有症状的急诊科患者,确定腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的存在对于其治疗至关重要。

目的

确定急诊科医生进行的腹主动脉急诊超声检查(EUS - AA)能否准确判定AAA的存在并指导急诊科的处置。

方法

这是一项在一家年就诊量超过10万例的城市急诊科进行的前瞻性观察性研究,连续两年纳入患者。所有疑似患有AAA的患者均接受了包括EUS - AA在内的标准急诊科评估,随后进行确诊性影像学检查或剖腹手术。AAA定义为任何测量直径大于3厘米。通过回顾性审查收集人口统计学数据、确诊性检查结果和患者结局。

结果

在两年期间,共有125例患者接受了EUS - AA检查。患者群体具有以下特征:平均年龄66岁,男性占54%,高血压占56%,冠状动脉疾病占39%,糖尿病占22%,外周血管疾病占14%。确诊性检查包括放射科超声检查,28/125(22%);腹部计算机断层扫描,95/125(76%);腹部磁共振成像,1/125(1%);以及剖腹手术,1/125(1%)。在125例患者中有29例(23%)被诊断为AAA;其中,29例中有27例在确诊性检查中患有AAA。EUS - AA的敏感性为100%(95%置信区间=89.5至100),特异性为98%(95%置信区间=92.8至99.8),阳性预测值为93%(27/29),阴性预测值为100%(96/96)。研究组总体的入院率为70%。27例AAA患者中有17例(63%)考虑立即进行手术治疗;10例患者被送往手术室。

结论

针对有症状的AAA患者群体,EUS - AA具有敏感性和特异性。这些数据表明,EUS - AA检查发现AAA应指导紧急会诊。无论患者从急诊科如何处置,急诊科医生都能够排除AAA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验