• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于袋装分类树的标准海德堡视网膜断层扫描参数的新型青光眼分类方法。

New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees.

作者信息

Mardin Christian Y, Hothorn Torsten, Peters Andrea, Jünemann Anselm G, Nguyen Nhung X, Lausen Berthold

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2003 Aug;12(4):340-6. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200308000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00061198-200308000-00008
PMID:12897579
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this article we propose and evaluate nonparametric tree classifiers that can handle non-normal data and a large number of possible predictors using the full set of standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements for classifying glaucoma.

METHODS

The classifiers were trained and tested using standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters from examinations of 98 subjects with glaucoma and 98 normal subjects of the Erlangen Glaucoma Registry. All patients and control subjects were evaluated by 15 degrees -optic disc stereographs, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements, standard computerized white-in-white perimetry, and 24-hour-intraocular pressure profiles. The subjects were matched by age and sex. Standard classification trees as well as bagged classification trees were used. The classification outcome of the trees was compared with the classification by two published linear discriminant functions based on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph variables with respect to their cross-validated misclassification error.

RESULTS

The bagged classification tree had the lowest misclassification error estimate of 14.8% with a sensitivity of 81.6% at a specificity of 88.8%. The cross-validated error rates of the two linear discriminant function procedures were 20.4% (sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 76.7%) and 20.6% (sensitivity 81.4%, specificity 77.3%) for our set of observations. Bagged classification trees were able to reduce the misclassification error of glaucoma classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Bagged classification trees promise to be a new and efficient approach for glaucoma classification using morphometric 2- and 3-dimensional data derived from the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, taking into account all given variables.

摘要

目的

在本文中,我们提出并评估了非参数树分类器,该分类器能够处理非正态数据以及大量可能的预测变量,并使用全套标准海德堡视网膜断层扫描测量数据来对青光眼进行分类。

方法

使用来自埃尔朗根青光眼登记处的98例青光眼患者和98例正常受试者的检查中的标准海德堡视网膜断层扫描参数对分类器进行训练和测试。所有患者和对照受试者均通过15度视盘立体照片、海德堡视网膜断层扫描测量、标准计算机化白对白视野检查以及24小时眼压曲线进行评估。受试者按年龄和性别进行匹配。使用了标准分类树以及袋装分类树。将树的分类结果与基于海德堡视网膜断层扫描变量的两个已发表的线性判别函数的分类结果在交叉验证误分类误差方面进行比较。

结果

袋装分类树的误分类误差估计最低,为14.8%,敏感度为81.6%,特异度为88.8%。对于我们的观察组,两种线性判别函数程序的交叉验证错误率分别为20.4%(敏感度82.6%,特异度76.7%)和20.6%(敏感度81.4%,特异度77.3%)。袋装分类树能够降低青光眼分类的误分类误差。

结论

考虑到所有给定变量,袋装分类树有望成为一种使用从海德堡视网膜断层扫描获得的形态学二维和三维数据进行青光眼分类的新的有效方法。

相似文献

1
New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees.基于袋装分类树的标准海德堡视网膜断层扫描参数的新型青光眼分类方法。
J Glaucoma. 2003 Aug;12(4):340-6. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200308000-00008.
2
Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements.通过视野检查和HRT测量相结合来改善青光眼诊断。
J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):299-305. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212232.03664.ee.
3
Comparison of optic nerve head parameters using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.比较海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪 3 和频域光学相干断层扫描仪的视神经头参数。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;40(7):721-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02782.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
4
[Comparison of Heidelberg retinal tomography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography examinations for detection of glaucoma].[海德堡视网膜断层扫描与光谱域光学相干断层扫描检测青光眼的比较]
Klin Oczna. 2013;115(2):125-9.
5
Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.频域光学相干断层扫描视网膜神经纤维层成像-海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪诊断符合度的研究。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb;117(2):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.061. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
6
Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3分类的诊断能力:青光眼概率评分与摩尔菲尔德回归分析对比
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):1981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.015. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
7
Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy.用于激光扫描图像的装袋树分类器:一种基于数据和模拟的策略。
Artif Intell Med. 2003 Jan;27(1):65-79. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(02)00085-4.
8
The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph.视盘大小对海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪诊断精度的影响。
Ophthalmology. 1997 Mar;104(3):545-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30277-2.
9
Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3区分正常眼睛和青光眼损伤的眼睛。
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):775-781.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.032. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
10
[Diagnostic capabilities of a classification program of the Heidelberg retina tomograph for early glaucomatous changes].[海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪分类程序对早期青光眼性改变的诊断能力]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1998 May;102(5):333-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Data Mining Framework for Glaucoma Decision Support Based on Optic Nerve Image Analysis Using Machine Learning Methods.一种基于机器学习方法的视神经图像分析的青光眼决策支持数据挖掘框架。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Jun 20;2(4):370-401. doi: 10.1007/s41666-018-0028-7. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Deep Learning Image Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Measured Vessel Density Improves Classification of Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes.深度学习对光学相干断层扫描血管造影测量的血管密度分析可提高健康眼与青光眼眼的分类准确性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;236:298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
3
Prediction for Intravenous Immunoglobulin Resistance Combining Genetic Risk Loci Identified From Next Generation Sequencing and Laboratory Data in Kawasaki Disease.
结合从下一代测序和川崎病实验室数据中鉴定出的遗传风险位点预测静脉注射免疫球蛋白抵抗性。
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 4;8:462367. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.462367. eCollection 2020.
4
Gradient-Boosting Classifiers Combining Vessel Density and Tissue Thickness Measurements for Classifying Early to Moderate Glaucoma.基于血管密度和组织厚度测量的梯度提升分类器在早期至中期青光眼分类中的应用。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;217:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Detecting abnormality in optic nerve head images using a feature extraction analysis.使用特征提取分析检测视神经乳头图像中的异常。
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Jun 11;5(7):2215-30. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.002215. eCollection 2014 Jul 1.
6
Diagnostic tools for glaucoma detection and management.用于青光眼检测与管理的诊断工具。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;53 Suppl1(SUPPL1):S17-32. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.003.
7
Predicting progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy using baseline standard automated perimetry data.使用基线标准自动视野计数据预测进行性青光眼性视神经病变
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;50(2):674-80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1767. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
8
Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.视神经乳头和视网膜神经纤维层分析:美国眼科学会报告
Ophthalmology. 2007 Oct;114(10):1937-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.005.
9
Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study.用于青光眼检测的光学相干断层扫描机器学习分类器:一项初步研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;46(11):4147-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0366.
10
Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.扫描激光偏振仪视网膜神经纤维层测量的相关向量机和支持向量机分类器分析
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Apr;46(4):1322-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1122.