Faineteau Henry, Gentaz Edouard, Viviani Paolo
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):166-72. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1526-1. Epub 2003 Jul 29.
An experiment investigated the mechanisms by which humans estimate Euclidean distances on the basis of kinaesthetic cues. Blindfolded participants followed straight and curvilinear paths with a hand-held stylus (encoding phase). Then, with a straight movement, they estimated the Euclidean distance between the start- and end-points of the path (response phase). The experiment contrasted an On-axis condition, in which encoding and response movements were spatially aligned, and an Off-axis condition, in which they were displaced laterally. Performances were slightly more accurate in the On-axis condition than in the Off-axis condition. In both conditions, however, errors were consistently smaller when the path covered a larger surface. The results showed that small paths yielded an overestimation of the Euclidean distance, the relative errors increasing with the length of curvilinear paths. The findings are compared with results of other studies in which distances were estimated on the basis of haptic cues.
一项实验研究了人类根据动觉线索估计欧几里得距离的机制。蒙眼参与者用手持触控笔沿着直线和曲线路径移动(编码阶段)。然后,通过直线移动,他们估计路径起点和终点之间的欧几里得距离(反应阶段)。该实验对比了两种情况:一种是轴上条件,即编码和反应动作在空间上对齐;另一种是轴外条件,即编码和反应动作在横向有位移。轴上条件下的表现比轴外条件下略为准确。然而,在两种条件下,当路径覆盖的面积较大时,误差始终较小。结果表明,短路径会导致对欧几里得距离的高估,相对误差随着曲线路径长度的增加而增大。这些发现与其他基于触觉线索估计距离的研究结果进行了比较。