Marder Stephen R, Glynn Shirley M, Wirshing William C, Wirshing Donna A, Ross Doreen, Widmark Clifford, Mintz Jim, Liberman Robert P, Blair Karen E
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;160(8):1405-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1405.
Most controlled studies comparing second-generation and conventional antipsychotics have focused on the acute treatment of schizophrenia. The authors compared symptom outcomes, side effects, and social adjustment in stable schizophrenia outpatients who received 2 years of maintenance treatment with risperidone or haloperidol.
This was a 2-year, randomized, double-blind comparison of 6 mg of risperidone versus haloperidol in 63 patients with stabilized DSM-IV schizophrenia. Study patients also received 15 months of standard behavioral skills training or enhanced training with a case manager who promoted patients' use of their skills in the community.
The risk of psychotic exacerbations and the risk of leaving the study were similar for both drug treatment groups. However, patients who received both risperidone and the enhanced community-based skills training were more likely to remain in the study than those in the other treatment groups. Patients demonstrated significant improvement in score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale over time with both medications. There were no between-group differences in cluster scores for thought disturbance, hostile-suspiciousness, and withdrawal-retardation. A significant between-group difference favoring risperidone was found for the anxious-depression cluster. Risperidone resulted in significantly greater reductions in tremor and akathisia and greater improvements in most items on the SCL-90-R.
When compared with patients given a low dose of haloperidol, risperidone-treated patients experienced similar improvements in positive and negative symptoms and similar risks of psychotic exacerbations. However, risperidone-treated patients appeared to feel subjectively better, as indicated by less anxiety and depression and fewer extrapyramidal side effects.
大多数比较第二代和传统抗精神病药物的对照研究都集中在精神分裂症的急性治疗上。作者比较了接受利培酮或氟哌啶醇维持治疗2年的稳定期精神分裂症门诊患者的症状转归、副作用和社会适应情况。
这是一项为期2年的随机双盲对照研究,63例符合DSM-IV标准的稳定期精神分裂症患者分别接受6mg利培酮或氟哌啶醇治疗。研究患者还接受了15个月的标准行为技能训练,或由个案管理员提供的强化训练,后者促进患者在社区中运用这些技能。
两个药物治疗组的精神病性症状加重风险和退出研究的风险相似。然而,同时接受利培酮和基于社区的强化技能训练的患者比其他治疗组的患者更有可能留在研究中。随着时间的推移,两种药物治疗的患者在简明精神病评定量表上的得分均有显著改善。在思维紊乱、敌对-猜疑和退缩-迟缓的聚类评分上,两组之间没有差异。在焦虑-抑郁聚类方面,发现利培酮组有显著优势。利培酮导致震颤和静坐不能的显著减少,并且在症状自评量表90项修订版(SCL-90-R)的大多数项目上有更大改善。
与接受低剂量氟哌啶醇治疗的患者相比,接受利培酮治疗的患者在阳性和阴性症状方面有相似的改善,精神病性症状加重的风险也相似。然而,利培酮治疗的患者主观感觉似乎更好,表现为焦虑和抑郁较少,锥体外系副作用也较少。