Suppr超能文献

临床微生物实验室中Osiris和Sirscan 2000抗菌药物敏感性检测系统的比较与评估

Comparison and evaluation of Osiris and Sirscan 2000 antimicrobial susceptibility systems in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

作者信息

Nijs A, Cartuyvels R, Mewis A, Peeters V, Rummens J L, Magerman K

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Virga Jesseziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3627-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3627-3630.2003.

Abstract

The Osiris and Sirscan 2000 systems are two semiautomated systems that can be used to read and interpret the results on disk diffusion agar plates. They are both used for determination of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. The present study compared both systems versus the NCCLS standard method of visual reading with a ruler. Both inpatient and outpatient samples with a total of 315 nonfastidious gram-negative strains were obtained. In total, 3724 organism-antimicrobial agent combinations that fulfilled the NCCLS guidelines for disk diffusion susceptibility testing were evaluated prospectively. The results obtained with both systems in comparison with those obtained by the classical nonautomated means of interpretation were excellent, with correlation coefficients of 0.96 for both systems. The overall agreements for susceptibility interpretation were 96.56 and 96.24% with the Osiris and Sirscan systems, respectively. Very major errors were obtained for 8 (1.07%) and 10 (1.34%) organism-antimicrobial agent combinations with the Osiris and Sirscan systems, respectively. In addition, major errors were obtained for 2 (0.07%) and 6 (0.21%) combinations with the Osiris and Sirscan systems, respectively. Minor errors were obtained for 118 and 124 organism-antimicrobial agent combinations with the Osiris and Sirscan systems, respectively. Overall, both the Osiris system and the Sirscan system are comparable and reliable systems for determination of interpretative categories from the zone diameters of standard disk diffusion test plates.

摘要

奥西里斯(Osiris)系统和Sirscan 2000系统是两个半自动系统,可用于读取和解释纸片扩散琼脂平板上的结果。它们都用于确定对抗菌药物的敏感性。本研究将这两个系统与NCCLS用尺子目视读取的标准方法进行了比较。共采集了315株非苛养革兰氏阴性菌的住院和门诊样本。总共前瞻性评估了3724种符合NCCLS纸片扩散药敏试验指南的微生物-抗菌药物组合。与传统的非自动化解释方法相比,这两个系统获得的结果都非常好,两个系统的相关系数均为0.96。奥西里斯系统和Sirscan系统药敏解释的总体一致性分别为96.56%和96.24%。奥西里斯系统和Sirscan系统分别有8种(1.07%)和10种(1.34%)微生物-抗菌药物组合出现了极重大错误。此外,奥西里斯系统和Sirscan系统分别有2种(0.07%)和6种(0.21%)组合出现了重大错误。奥西里斯系统和Sirscan系统分别有118种和124种微生物-抗菌药物组合出现了微小错误。总体而言,奥西里斯系统和Sirscan系统在根据标准纸片扩散试验平板的抑菌圈直径确定解释类别方面都是可比且可靠的系统。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Unveiling the Potential of Protein-Based Sustainable Antibacterial Materials.揭示基于蛋白质的可持续抗菌材料的潜力。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Apr;17(2):737-762. doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10381-6. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Methods for evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review.抗菌活性评估方法:综述
J Pharm Anal. 2016 Apr;6(2):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验