Trzaska Hubert
Instytutu Telekomunikacji i Akustyki Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):197-201.
A critical review of protection regulations (or their proposals) on work safety regarding electromagnetic fields as well as the general public protection against unwanted exposure to the fields are presented in this paper. The standards of the Western World are illogical in both aspects, biomedical knowledge and technical. The results (permissible exposures) are defined more precisely than the input data. In Poland, two independent acts are in force: one on occupational exposures and the other on non-occupational exposures. The former is "a world-better", but requires to be immediately changed to a standard that is applicable and friendly to its users. The latter can be accepted after introducing several amendments. The enlargement of the environmental standard to include occupational issues may create a good Polish proposal also useful at the international level.
本文对有关电磁场的工作安全保护法规(或其提案)以及公众免受有害电磁场照射的保护情况进行了批判性综述。西方世界的标准在生物医学知识和技术这两个方面都是不合逻辑的。结果(允许暴露量)的定义比输入数据更为精确。在波兰,有两项独立的法案生效:一项关于职业暴露,另一项关于非职业暴露。前者堪称“世界一流”,但需要立即改为适用且对用户友好的标准。后者在进行若干修订后可以接受。将环境标准扩大到涵盖职业问题,可能会形成一项对波兰有益且在国际层面也有用的提案。