• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[波兰针对0至300吉赫兹电磁场的防护。新法规及其与欧盟要求协调统一的前景]

[Protection against electromagnetic fields 0-300 GHz in Poland. New regulations and perspectives if their harmonization wit the European Union requirements].

作者信息

Trzaska Hubert

机构信息

Instytutu Telekomunikacji i Akustyki Politechniki Wrocławskiej.

出版信息

Med Pr. 2003;54(2):197-201.

PMID:12924005
Abstract

A critical review of protection regulations (or their proposals) on work safety regarding electromagnetic fields as well as the general public protection against unwanted exposure to the fields are presented in this paper. The standards of the Western World are illogical in both aspects, biomedical knowledge and technical. The results (permissible exposures) are defined more precisely than the input data. In Poland, two independent acts are in force: one on occupational exposures and the other on non-occupational exposures. The former is "a world-better", but requires to be immediately changed to a standard that is applicable and friendly to its users. The latter can be accepted after introducing several amendments. The enlargement of the environmental standard to include occupational issues may create a good Polish proposal also useful at the international level.

摘要

本文对有关电磁场的工作安全保护法规(或其提案)以及公众免受有害电磁场照射的保护情况进行了批判性综述。西方世界的标准在生物医学知识和技术这两个方面都是不合逻辑的。结果(允许暴露量)的定义比输入数据更为精确。在波兰,有两项独立的法案生效:一项关于职业暴露,另一项关于非职业暴露。前者堪称“世界一流”,但需要立即改为适用且对用户友好的标准。后者在进行若干修订后可以接受。将环境标准扩大到涵盖职业问题,可能会形成一项对波兰有益且在国际层面也有用的提案。

相似文献

1
[Protection against electromagnetic fields 0-300 GHz in Poland. New regulations and perspectives if their harmonization wit the European Union requirements].[波兰针对0至300吉赫兹电磁场的防护。新法规及其与欧盟要求协调统一的前景]
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):197-201.
2
[Limitations of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields adopted by Polish law from the perspectives of international documents with particular reference to fields of low and medium frequencies].[从国际文件角度看波兰法律所采用的职业性电磁场暴露限制,特别提及低频和中频电磁场领域]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):269-78.
3
[Conference of "Protection against electromagnetic fields 0-300 GHz in Poland--new regulations and perspectives and their harmonization with the European Union requirements" (Part II), December 16-17 2002, Lodz, Poland].["波兰0 - 300吉赫兹电磁场防护会议——新规定、前景及其与欧盟要求的协调统一(第二部分)",2002年12月16 - 17日,波兰罗兹]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):267-8.
4
[Environment protection against electromagnetic fields. Legal point of view].[针对电磁场的环境保护。法律视角]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):285-7.
5
[Verification of Polish regulations of maximum permissible intensities in electromagnetic fields by the Commission for Bioelectromagnetic Issues of the Polish Radiation Research Society].[波兰辐射研究协会生物电磁问题委员会对波兰电磁场最大允许强度规定的验证]
Med Pr. 2005;56(6):501-13.
6
[Polish regulations on maximum admissible intensities for electric and magnetic frequencies of 60 Hz and the European Union recommendations for electrical power engineering].[波兰关于60赫兹电和磁频率的最大允许强度的规定以及欧盟对电力工程的建议]
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):175-9.
7
[Measurements of electromagnetic fields and evaluation of occupational exposure: PN-T-06580:2002 requirements and principles adopted in the European Union].[电磁场测量与职业暴露评估:PN-T-06580:2002欧盟采用的要求和原则]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):279-84.
8
[Problems with implementation of Polish standards on admissible electromagnetic field levels by the State Sanitary Inspectorate and of the measuring teams].[国家卫生监督局及测量团队在实施波兰关于可允许电磁场水平标准方面存在的问题]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):289-90.
9
[National system of protection against electromagnetic fields 0 Hz-300 GHz in the light of current legal regulations].[根据现行法律法规的0赫兹至300吉赫兹电磁场国家防护体系]
Med Pr. 2006;57(2):151-9.
10
[Polish guidelines of 2001 for maximum admissible intensities in high frequency EMF versus European Union recommendations].[2001年波兰关于高频电磁场最大允许强度的指南与欧盟建议对比]
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):181-7.