Johnson G, Almqvist H
Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerodontology. 2003 Jul;20(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2003.00009.x.
In disabled and infirm patients with limited, if any, capacity for independent oral self-care, it is difficult to control progression of root caries lesions.
To evaluate the effect of non-restorative cariostatic treatment on progression of active superficial root caries lesions (n = 56).
Pilot study.
Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge.
15 physically-dependent patients.
The patients were allotted to one of the following groups. Group 1, professional tooth cleaning and application of tap water flavoured with eucalyptus oil; Group 2, professional tooth cleaning and application of Cervitec, (1% chlorhexidine in thymol-containing varnish), Group 3, professional tooth cleaning and application of Cervitec and Fluor Protector (varnish containing 0.1% fluoride). Every three months for 18 months, each subject received the treatment twice within a 10-day interval.
The status of the 56 root caries lesions was evaluated every six months using a root caries index based on visual and tactile criteria. The examiners were blind to which treatment group the patients belonged.
In most subjects (14 out of 15), progression of root caries lesions was arrested. No statistically significant differences could be demonstrated between the three treatment groups. However, regardless of treatment regimen, there was a statistically significant difference between the greater number of subjects exhibiting no progression of root caries lesions and those with lesion progression, at 6 (p = 0.022), 12 (p = 0.006) and 18 months (p < 0.001).
This pilot study suggests that in disabled and infirm patients regular professional tooth cleaning with a fluoride containing paste, with or without supplementary varnishing with chlorhexidine-thymol and/or fluoride can prevent further progression of existing superficial root caries lesions.
在自理能力有限甚至没有自理能力的残疾和体弱患者中,很难控制根龋病变的进展。
评估非修复性防龋治疗对活动性浅表根龋病变(n = 56)进展的影响。
试点研究。
卡罗林斯卡学院胡丁厄牙科学院龋病科。
15名身体依赖他人的患者。
将患者分配到以下组之一。第1组,专业牙齿清洁并涂抹含桉叶油的自来水;第2组,专业牙齿清洁并涂抹Cervitec(含1%氯己定的含百里酚清漆);第3组,专业牙齿清洁并涂抹Cervitec和氟保护漆(含0.1%氟化物的清漆)。在18个月内,每三个月,每个受试者在10天间隔内接受两次治疗。
每六个月使用基于视觉和触觉标准的根龋指数评估56个根龋病变的状况。检查人员对患者所属的治疗组不知情。
在大多数受试者(15名中的14名)中,根龋病变的进展得到了阻止。三个治疗组之间未显示出统计学上的显著差异。然而,无论治疗方案如何,在6个月(p = 0.022)、12个月(p = 0.006)和18个月(p < 0.001)时,表现为根龋病变无进展的受试者数量较多与有病变进展的受试者数量之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
这项试点研究表明,在残疾和体弱患者中,使用含氟牙膏进行定期专业牙齿清洁,无论是否辅以氯己定 - 百里酚和/或氟化物清漆,都可以防止现有浅表根龋病变的进一步进展。