Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf D H, Miller C
Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Sep;57(9):659-62. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.9.659.
Health impact assessment (HIA) seeks to expand evaluation of policy and programmes in all sectors, both private and public, to include their impact on population health. While the idea that the public's health is affected by a broad array of social and economic policies is not new and dates back well over two centuries, what is new is the notion-increasingly adopted by major health institutions, such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Kingdom National Health Services (NHS)-that health should be an explicit consideration when evaluating all public policies. In this article, it is argued that while HIA has the potential to enhance recognition of societal determinants of health and of intersectoral responsibility for health, its pitfalls warrant critical attention. Greater clarity is required regarding criteria for initiating, conducting, and completing HIA, including rules pertaining to decision making, enforcement, compliance, plus paying for their conduct. Critical debate over the promise, process, and pitfalls of HIA needs to be informed by multiple disciplines and perspectives from diverse people and regions of the world.
健康影响评估(HIA)旨在扩大对所有部门(包括私营和公共部门)政策和计划的评估,将其对人群健康的影响纳入其中。虽然公众健康受到广泛的社会和经济政策影响这一观点并不新鲜,可追溯到两个多世纪以前,但新的是,诸如世界卫生组织(WHO)和英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)等主要卫生机构越来越多地采用这样一种观念,即在评估所有公共政策时应明确考虑健康因素。本文认为,虽然健康影响评估有潜力增强对健康的社会决定因素以及健康的部门间责任的认识,但其缺陷值得密切关注。在启动、开展和完成健康影响评估的标准方面,包括与决策、执行、合规以及开展评估的费用支付相关的规则,需要更加明确。关于健康影响评估的前景、过程和缺陷的批判性辩论需要多学科以及来自世界不同人群和地区的多种观点的参与。