Burke Darren G., Holt Laurence E., Rasmussen Roy, MacKinnon Natalie C., Vossen Jeffery F., Pelham Thomas W.
St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Athl Train. 2001 Mar;36(1):16-19.
To compare the changes in hamstring length resulting from modified proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation flexibility training in combination with cold-water immersion, hot-water immersion, and stretching alone. DESIGN AND SETTING: Training-only subjects stood motionless for 10 minutes, while subjects in the cold group stood in a cold-water bath (8 degrees +/- 1 degrees C) immersed up to the gluteal fold for 10 minutes, and subjects in the hot group stood in a hot-water bath (44 degrees +/- 1 degrees C) immersed up to the gluteal fold for 10 minutes. All subjects exercised only the right lower limb using a modified proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation flexibility protocol, consisting of 1 set of 4 repetitions. This procedure was followed for 5 consecutive days. SUBJECTS: Forty-five uninjured subjects (21 women, 24 men; age range, 18-25 years) were randomly assigned to the cold, hot, or stretching-alone group. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were measured for maximum active hip flexion on the first and fifth days. RESULTS: Group results were assessed using a 2 x 3 analysis of variance, comparing changes in hamstring length from pretest to posttest. All 3 groups had significant improvements in hamstring length (pretest to posttest) (P <.05). However, no significant differences occurred among groups. CONCLUSIONS: No advantage was apparent in using complete hot or cold immersion to increase hamstring length in healthy subjects.
比较改良的本体感觉神经肌肉促进法灵活性训练结合冷水浸泡、热水浸泡和单纯拉伸后腘绳肌长度的变化。
仅进行训练的受试者静止站立10分钟,而冷疗组受试者在冷水浴(8摄氏度±1摄氏度)中浸泡至臀褶处10分钟,热疗组受试者在热水浴(44摄氏度±1摄氏度)中浸泡至臀褶处10分钟。所有受试者仅使用改良的本体感觉神经肌肉促进法灵活性方案锻炼右下肢,包括1组,每组重复4次。此程序连续进行5天。
45名未受伤的受试者(21名女性,24名男性;年龄范围18 - 25岁)被随机分配至冷疗组、热疗组或单纯拉伸组。
在第1天和第5天测量受试者的最大主动髋关节屈曲度。
使用2×3方差分析评估组间结果,比较从测试前到测试后腘绳肌长度的变化。所有3组的腘绳肌长度(从测试前到测试后)均有显著改善(P<.05)。然而,各组之间无显著差异。
对于健康受试者,使用完全的热水或冷水浸泡来增加腘绳肌长度并无明显优势。