Suppr超能文献

静态、动态和本体感觉神经肌肉促进伸展技术对柔韧性的比较研究。

Comparative study of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques on flexibility.

作者信息

Lucas R C, Koslow R

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Apr;58(2):615-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.615.

Abstract

63 college women served as subjects in this 7-wk. study examining the effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitating stretching techniques on the flexibility of the hamstring-gastrocnemius muscles. Subjects were assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups and received treatment 3 days a week. A pretest, a midtest (after 11 treatment days), and a posttest (after 21 treatment days) were administered. Analysis of group and test effects was accomplished by using a 3 X 3 factorial design with the group factor nested and the test factor crossed. Post hoc analysis indicated that all scores significantly improved from pretest to posttest. The findings indicated all 3 methods of flexibility training produced significant improvements when pretest and posttest mean scores were compared.

摘要

63名大学女生参与了这项为期7周的研究,该研究旨在检验静态、动态和本体感觉神经肌肉促进伸展技术对腘绳肌-腓肠肌灵活性的影响。受试者被分配到3个治疗组中的一组,每周接受3天治疗。进行了一次预测试、一次中期测试(在治疗11天后)和一次后测试(在治疗21天后)。通过使用3×3析因设计来完成对组间和测试效果的分析,其中组因素嵌套,测试因素交叉。事后分析表明,从预测试到后测试,所有分数都有显著提高。研究结果表明,当比较预测试和后测试的平均分数时,所有3种灵活性训练方法都产生了显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验