Suppr超能文献

在局部麻醉下扁桃体切除术中,罗哌卡因与利多卡因的比较。

Ropivacaine compared to lidocaine for tonsillectomy under local anaesthesia.

作者信息

Apostolopoulos Kostas, Labropoulou Ekaterini, Samaan Ragheed, Bogris Konstantinos

机构信息

ENT Clinic, General State Hospital of Kalamata, Kalamata, Greece.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Aug;260(7):355-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-002-0567-6. Epub 2003 Mar 12.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of ropivacaine compared to lidocaine for tonsillectomy under local anaesthesia. During the last 2 years, 77 patients undergoing tonsillectomy under local anaesthesia in the seated position were randomised to receive ropivacaine or lidocaine. The following parameters were recorded: time to surgical anaesthesia, the duration of the procedure, postoperative pain, the need for analgesics during the first 10 h after surgery, cardiac arrhythmias, the occurrence of allergic reaction and larynx spasm. It took significantly longer to reach surgical anaesthesia in the ropivacaine patients (8.3+/-1.3 min versus 2.7+/-0.8 min.), but the pain immediately following the procedure was significantly lower (1.0+/-0.4 versus 2.6+/-1.0). Adjuvant analgetics were administered later and in significantly lower doses in the ropivacaine patients. There were no adverse reactions. In conclusion, ropivacaine in local tonsillectomy is safe, has a longer onset-time, but is more efficient concerning postoperative pain than lidocaine.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨在局部麻醉下行扁桃体切除术时,罗哌卡因与利多卡因相比的安全性和有效性。在过去2年中,77例在坐位下行局部麻醉扁桃体切除术的患者被随机分为接受罗哌卡因或利多卡因组。记录以下参数:手术麻醉时间、手术持续时间、术后疼痛、术后前10小时内使用镇痛药的必要性、心律失常、过敏反应和喉痉挛的发生情况。罗哌卡因组患者达到手术麻醉的时间明显更长(8.3±1.3分钟对2.7±0.8分钟),但术后即刻疼痛明显更低(1.0±0.4对2.6±1.0)。罗哌卡因组患者辅助镇痛药的使用时间更晚且剂量明显更低。未出现不良反应。总之,局部扁桃体切除术中使用罗哌卡因是安全的,起效时间更长,但在术后疼痛方面比利多卡因更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验