• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五因素模型中的竞争与合作:成就取向的个体差异

Competition and cooperation in the five-factor model: individual differences in achievement orientation.

作者信息

Ross Scott R, Rausch M Karega, Canada Kelli E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, DePauw University, Greencastle, IN 46135, USA.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2003 Jul;137(4):323-37. doi: 10.1080/00223980309600617.

DOI:10.1080/00223980309600617
PMID:12943183
Abstract

The authors investigated the relationship between basic achievement orientations of competition and cooperation and the five-factor model of personality as measured by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992). They examined 2 types of competition: hypercompetition (R. M. Ryckman, B. Thornton, & J. C. Butler, 1994) and personal development competition (R. M. Ryckman, M. Hammer, L. M. Kaczor, & J. A. Gold, 1996), as conceptualized by K. Horney (1937). In a sample of 251 young adults, 14% to 38% of the variance in achievement orientations was collectively predicted by NEO-PI-R domain scales. Of NEO-PI-R predictors, Agreeableness was most important in characterizing differences between various achievement orientations; Agreeableness was negatively related to hypercompetition, positively related to cooperation, and unrelated to personal development competition. Extraversion was positively related to both cooperation and personal development competition but was unrelated to hypercompetition. In contrast, Openness and Conscientiousness were least helpful in differentiating among achievement orientations. These findings support the useful application of the NEO-PI-R in achievement research and highlight competition and cooperation as interpersonally laden achievement orientations.

摘要

作者研究了竞争与合作的基本成就取向与由修订版大五人格量表(NEO-PI-R;P.T. 科斯塔和R.R. 麦克雷,1992年)所测量的人格五因素模型之间的关系。他们考察了两种类型的竞争:由K. 霍妮(1937年)概念化的超竞争(R.M. 里克曼、B. 桑顿和J.C. 巴特勒,1994年)和个人发展竞争(R.M. 里克曼、M. 哈默、L.M. 卡佐尔和J.A. 戈尔德,1996年)。在一个由251名年轻人组成的样本中,NEO-PI-R领域量表共同预测了成就取向中14%至38%的方差。在NEO-PI-R的预测因素中,宜人性在刻画不同成就取向之间的差异时最为重要;宜人性与超竞争呈负相关,与合作呈正相关,与个人发展竞争无关。外向性与合作和个人发展竞争均呈正相关,但与超竞争无关。相比之下,开放性和尽责性在区分成就取向方面最无帮助。这些发现支持了NEO-PI-R在成就研究中的有效应用,并突出了竞争与合作作为人际负载的成就取向。

相似文献

1
Competition and cooperation in the five-factor model: individual differences in achievement orientation.五因素模型中的竞争与合作:成就取向的个体差异
J Psychol. 2003 Jul;137(4):323-37. doi: 10.1080/00223980309600617.
2
Personality traits and achievement motives: theoretical and empirical relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale.人格特质与成就动机:修订版大五人格量表与成就动机量表之间的理论与实证关系
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):579-92. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.2.579-592.
3
Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.65至100岁医疗保险患者全因死亡率的领域和层面人格预测因素
Psychosom Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;67(5):724-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181272.58103.18.
4
A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.从五因素模型角度看法医精神病学样本中的精神病态与共病的轴II障碍
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
5
The Five-factor Personality Inventory as a measure of the Five-factor Model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R.作为五因素模型测量工具的五因素人格量表:比利时、美国和匈牙利与NEO-PI-R的比较
Assessment. 2004 Sep;11(3):207-15. doi: 10.1177/1073191104265800.
6
Short-term stability of NEO-PI-R personality trait scores in opioid-dependent outpatients.阿片类药物依赖门诊患者中NEO-PI-R人格特质分数的短期稳定性
Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Sep;15(3):255-60.
7
Personality and personal projects: linking big five and PAC units of analysis.人格与个人计划:连接大五人格与个人行动过程分析单元
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):501-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00982.x.
8
Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items.对NEO-PI-R项目的实验性操纵。
J Pers Assess. 2001 Oct;77(2):339-58. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_14.
9
Relation between alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality: a facet-level analysis.述情障碍与人格五因素模型的关系:层面分析
J Pers Assess. 1999 Dec;73(3):345-58. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7303_4.
10
Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.在精神病态评估中比较两种通用人格的替代测量方法:NEO人格量表修订版(NEO PI-R)和多维人格问卷(MPQ)的测试
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):965-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the concept of personality capacious enough to incorporate virtues?人格的概念是否足够宽泛,能够包含各种美德?
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1232637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232637. eCollection 2023.
2
Co-Development of Adolescents' Cooperative and Competitive Attitudes: How it Predicts Mental Health and Academic Achievement.青少年合作与竞争态度的共同发展:及其对心理健康和学业成就的预测作用
J Res Adolesc. 2022 Jun;32(2):681-695. doi: 10.1111/jora.12765. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Examining Psychedelic-Induced Changes in Social Functioning and Connectedness in a Naturalistic Online Sample Using the Five-Factor Model of Personality.
使用人格五因素模型研究自然主义在线样本中迷幻药引起的社会功能和联系的变化。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:749788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749788. eCollection 2021.