López-Longo F J, Rodríguez-Mahou M, Escalona-Monge M, González C M, Monteagudo I, Carreño-Pérez L
Service of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lupus. 2003;12(8):623-9. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu439oa.
The objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of an automated multiparameter line immunoassay system compared with other techniques for the identification of autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases. We studied sera from 90 patients. Anti-U1RNP, anti-Sm, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-Jo 1 and anti-Scl 70 antibodies were identified by counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoblotting (IB) using extracts of rabbit thymus and human placenta, and an automated multiparameter line immunoassay system (INNO-LIA ANA UPDATE K-1090) that detects nine different antibodies simultaneously (anti-U1RNP, anti-Sm, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-Scl 70, anti-Jo 1, anticentromere, antihistone, and antiribosomal P protein). The line immunoassay system equaled or surpassed the other techniques in the identification of anti-Sm, anti-La/SS-B, anti-Jo 1 and anti-Scl 70 antibodies (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94-100%) and was similarly effective in the case of anti-U1RNP (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 93.9%) and anti-Ro/SS-A (sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 87.2%) antibodies. In addition, this technique detected more 52 and 60 kD anti-Ro/SS-A sera than IB. Nine antibodies can be detected with this method at a cost of 25.38 Euros per serum sample. In five hours, 19 sera can be studied. The approximate cost of detecting these nine antibodies with an automated ELISA system would be 28.93 Euros, which allows 10 sera to be studied in four hours. In conclusion, the automated multiparameter line immunoassay system is a valid method for the detection of autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases. Its most notable advantages are automated simultaneous detection of several autoantibodies in the same serum and its lower cost compared with ELISA techniques.
目的是确定一种自动化多参数线性免疫分析系统与其他技术相比,在识别风湿性疾病自身抗体方面的敏感性和特异性。我们研究了90例患者的血清。通过对流免疫电泳(CIE)技术、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、使用兔胸腺和人胎盘提取物的免疫印迹法(IB)以及一种能同时检测九种不同抗体(抗U1RNP、抗Sm、抗Ro/SS-A、抗La/SS-B、抗Scl 70、抗Jo 1、抗着丝粒、抗组蛋白和抗核糖体P蛋白)的自动化多参数线性免疫分析系统(INNO-LIA ANA UPDATE K-1090)来识别抗U1RNP、抗Sm、抗Ro/SS-A、抗La/SS-B、抗Jo 1和抗Scl 70抗体。该线性免疫分析系统在识别抗Sm、抗La/SS-B、抗Jo 1和抗Scl 70抗体方面等同于或超过其他技术(敏感性100%,特异性94 - 100%),在抗U1RNP(敏感性87.5%,特异性93.9%)和抗Ro/SS-A(敏感性91.4%,特异性87.2%)抗体检测方面同样有效。此外,该技术检测出的52和60 kD抗Ro/SS-A血清比免疫印迹法更多。用这种方法检测血清样本,每份成本为25.38欧元,可同时检测九种抗体。五小时内可检测19份血清。用自动化ELISA系统检测这九种抗体的大致成本为28.93欧元,四小时内可检测10份血清。总之,自动化多参数线性免疫分析系统是检测风湿性疾病自身抗体的一种有效方法。其最显著的优点是能在同一血清中自动同时检测多种自身抗体,且与ELISA技术相比成本更低。