Rodby Roger A, Chiou Chion Fang, Borenstein Jeff, Smitten Allison, Sengupta Nishan, Palmer Andrew J, Roze Stéphane, Annemans Lieven, Simon Teresa A, Chen Roland S, Lewis Edmund J
Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Ther. 2003 Jul;25(7):2102-19. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80208-4.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD)-related health care costs are substantial. Improving clinical outcomes in patients at risk of progression to ESRD could lead to considerable health care savings.
We estimated the cost-effectiveness of irbesartan compared with placebo or amlodipine in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and overt nephropathy.
Three treatments for hypertension patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy were assessed: (1) irbesartan, (2) amlodipine, and (3) placebo. A Markov model was developed based on primary data from the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial and the United States Renal Data System. Projected survival and costs were compared for each treatment at 3-, 10-, and 25-year time horizons. Different assumptions of treatment benefits and costs were tested with use of sensitivity analyses.
At 10 and 25 years, the model projected irbesartan to be both the least costly and most effective (ie, demonstrating a survival advantage) strategy. At 25
