Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病儿童持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射方案的比较:一项随机开放交叉试验。

Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens in children with type 1 diabetes: a randomized open crossover trial.

作者信息

Weintrob Naomi, Benzaquen Hadassa, Galatzer Avinoam, Shalitin Shlomit, Lazar Liora, Fayman Gila, Lilos Pearl, Dickerman Zvi, Phillip Moshe

机构信息

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):559-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.559.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and feasibility of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in children with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

The study sample included 23 children (10 males) aged 9.4 to 13.9 years with type 1 diabetes. An open randomized crossover design was used to compare 3.5 months of CSII to 3.5 months of MDI therapy for the following variables: diabetic control, incidence of adverse events, daily insulin requirement, body mass index standard deviation scores, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life.

RESULTS

The changes in HbA(1c) and fructoseamine values were similar in the 2 arms over time. At the end of the study, mean HbA(1c) level measured 8.05 +/- 0.78%. There were no differences between the treatment modes in frequency of symptomatic hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic events. There was 1 event of severe hypoglycemia during pump therapy and 3 during MDI, yielding a rate of 0.26 events per patient-year. There were no episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis. Body mass index standard deviation scores decreased during CSII and increased during MDI, as did mean insulin dose. Patients expressed a higher treatment satisfaction from CSII than MDI, although there was no difference in quality of life between the 2 modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive insulin therapy by either insulin pump or MDI is safe in children and young adolescents with type 1 diabetes, with similar diabetes control and a very low rate of adverse events. We suggest that both modes be available to the diabetic team to better tailor therapy.

摘要

目的

比较持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)与多次皮下注射胰岛素(MDI)治疗1型糖尿病儿童的疗效及可行性。

方法

研究样本包括23例9.4至13.9岁的1型糖尿病儿童(10例男性)。采用开放随机交叉设计,比较3.5个月的CSII治疗与3.5个月的MDI治疗在以下变量方面的差异:糖尿病控制情况、不良事件发生率、每日胰岛素需求量、体重指数标准差评分、治疗满意度及生活质量。

结果

随着时间推移,两组的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和糖化血清蛋白值变化相似。研究结束时,平均HbA1c水平为8.05±0.78%。两种治疗方式在有症状的低血糖或高血糖事件发生频率上无差异。泵治疗期间发生1例严重低血糖事件,MDI治疗期间发生3例,每患者年发生率为0.26次。无糖尿病酮症酸中毒发作。CSII期间体重指数标准差评分下降,MDI期间上升,平均胰岛素剂量变化情况相同。患者对CSII治疗的满意度高于MDI治疗,尽管两种治疗方式的生活质量无差异。

结论

胰岛素泵或MDI强化胰岛素治疗对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年是安全的,糖尿病控制情况相似,不良事件发生率极低。我们建议糖尿病治疗团队同时具备这两种治疗方式,以便更好地调整治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验