• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用GelPort进行手辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术。

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort.

作者信息

Nakajima K, Lee S W, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Kim K, Sonoda T, Milsom J W

机构信息

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):102-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8648-6. Epub 2003 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-002-8648-6
PMID:12958676
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An easily usable hand access device will optimize success in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). The authors describe their initial series of HALS colorectal resections using GelPort to evaluate their current technique and results with this new device.

METHODS

A retrospective study investigated 33 HALS colorectal procedures including total colectomy ( n = 16) and low anterior resection ( n = 10). All operative data, including intraoperative GelPort performance, were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 3 (9.1%) of 33 HALS procedures were converted to open surgery, and 4 (13.3%) of 30 HALS procedures required minimal enlargement of incisions to facilitate extracorporeal procedures. The operative time was 263 +/- 85 min, and the blood loss was 282 +/- 148 ml. There were no device malfunctions. Three major complications (9.1%) and 7 minor wound infections (21%) were noted postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 7.9 +/- 3.8 days.

CONCLUSION

When performed with GelPort, HALS is safely and reliably applicable for various colorectal procedures.

摘要

背景

一种易于使用的手部接入装置将优化手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)的成功率。作者描述了他们最初一系列使用GelPort进行的HALS结直肠切除术,以评估他们目前使用这种新装置的技术和结果。

方法

一项回顾性研究调查了33例HALS结直肠手术,包括全结肠切除术(n = 16)和低位前切除术(n = 10)。所有手术数据,包括术中GelPort的性能,均进行前瞻性记录并回顾性分析。

结果

在本研究中,33例HALS手术中有3例(9.1%)转为开放手术,30例HALS手术中有4例(13.3%)需要稍微扩大切口以利于体外操作。手术时间为263±85分钟,失血量为282±148毫升。没有器械故障。术后发现3例严重并发症(9.1%)和7例轻微伤口感染(21%)。平均住院时间为7.9±3.8天。

结论

使用GelPort进行HALS时,可安全可靠地应用于各种结直肠手术。

相似文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort.使用GelPort进行手辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):102-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8648-6. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
2
Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique.腹腔镜全结肠切除术:手辅助与标准技术对比
Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):582-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8135-8. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
3
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.手辅助腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的前瞻性随机试验。手辅助腹腔镜手术研究组
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):896-901.
4
Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies.969例微创结肠切除术的经验:手辅助腹腔镜在扩大复杂结肠切除术微创手术中的作用。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May;206(5):946-50; discussion 950-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.021. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
5
Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.比较传统腹腔镜结肠切除术与手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术的前瞻性随机试验:适用性、近期临床结果、炎症反应及成本。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8168-9. Epub 2001 Oct 13.
6
Experience with hand assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon.手辅助腹腔镜结肠手术的经验
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):13-8.
7
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study.手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术与开放性结肠切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8148-3. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
9
Laparoscopic-assisted colon and rectal surgery - lessons learnt from early experience.腹腔镜辅助结肠和直肠手术——早期经验教训
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005 Apr;34(3):223-8.
10
The Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Technique in the Age of Single-Incision Laparoscopy: An Effective Alternative to Avoid Open Conversion in Colorectal Surgery.手辅助腹腔镜技术在单孔腹腔镜时代的作用:结直肠手术中避免转为开腹手术的有效替代方法
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):415-421. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0553. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.手辅助腹腔镜下溃疡性结肠炎回肠贮袋肛管吻合术全直肠系膜切除术
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;13(4):256-260. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_230_16.
2
Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Review of current developments and future perspectives.炎症性肠病的微创手术:当前进展与未来展望综述
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May 6;7(2):217-26. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.217.
3
The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in a right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.比较传统腹腔镜结肠切除术与手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术的前瞻性随机试验:适用性、近期临床结果、炎症反应及成本。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8168-9. Epub 2001 Oct 13.
2
Hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection: initial experience with a new procedure.手辅助腹腔镜低位前切除术:一种新手术的初步经验
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):431-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9084-8. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
3
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
手辅助腹腔镜手术在右侧结肠癌右半结肠切除术中的作用。
Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Feb;30(1):11-7. doi: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.11. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
4
Anal function-preserving subtotal intersphincteric resection/partial external sphincteric resection with hybrid 2-port hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (Mukai's operation) for very low stage I rectal cancer: A case report.保留肛门功能的次全括约肌间切除术/部分外括约肌切除术联合两孔手辅助腹腔镜手术(向井手术)治疗极早期Ⅰ期直肠癌:一例报告
Oncol Lett. 2011 Sep 1;2(5):801-805. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.327. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery using Gelport.使用Gelport进行手辅助腹腔镜手术。
J Minim Access Surg. 2005 Sep;1(3):110-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.18994.
6
The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in subtotal and total colectomy for Crohn's colitis.手助腹腔镜手术在克罗恩病结肠次全切除和全切除中的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2713-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1031-0. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
7
Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pushing the envelope.腹腔镜检查在炎症性肠病中的应用:突破极限
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006 Feb;19(1):26-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939528.
8
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?腹腔镜结肠癌切除术:与传统肿瘤手术相当吗?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 Aug;18(3):174-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916278.
9
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
手辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术
Surg Endosc. 2000 Nov;14(11):999-1004. doi: 10.1007/s004640000325.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.手辅助腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的前瞻性随机试验。手辅助腹腔镜手术研究组
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):896-901.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview.
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):891-5. doi: 10.1007/s004640020019.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients.使用HandPort系统的手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS):68例患者的初步经验。
Ann Surg. 2000 May;231(5):715-23. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00012.
7
Handoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter trial of a minimally invasive technique for complex abdominal surgery. Southern Surgeons' Club Study Group.手辅助腹腔镜手术:一项针对复杂腹部手术微创技术的前瞻性多中心试验。南方外科医生俱乐部研究小组。
Arch Surg. 1999 May;134(5):477-85; discussion 485-6.