• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners.

作者信息

Hengst Julie A

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 61820, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Aug;46(4):831-48. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/065).

DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/065)
PMID:12959463
Abstract

H. H. Clark (1992) argues that successful referencing depends on speakers and listeners working together to establish shared perspectives on target objects. In his collaborative referencing model, he identifies 3 phases in the referencing process: initiation, refashioning, and acceptance. For referencing tasks, successful collaboration can be seen in the streamlining of referencing expressions and in the decrease of overt collaborative effort across trials. Although previous studies have shown that speakers with aphasia can be successful on referencing tasks, they have not examined how that success is achieved through the collaborative work of the partners. Using a referencing task adapted from H. H. Clark and D. Wilkes-Gibbs (1986), this study examined how 4 adults with moderate-to-severe aphasia collaborated with routine communication partners (spouses or children). Overall, these pairs completed the referencing task trials with 96% accuracy and displayed referencing processes that generally conformed to Clark's collaborative referencing model. Close analysis of the discourse of these interactions revealed patterns of collaboration that went beyond Clark's model-the pairs used diverse verbal and nonverbal resources, actively negotiated the task across trials, and layered their own personal goals and perspectives onto these interactions. This study highlights the plasticity of functional communication (the diversity of ways the pairs worked together to complete the same task) and points to the importance of understanding processes of tacit learning that take place in social interactions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Aug;46(4):831-48. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/065).
2
Collaborative referencing in elderly women.
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Dec;81(3 Pt 1):995-1000. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3.995.
3
Multiple voices in clinical discourse and as clinical intervention.临床话语中的多种声音以及作为临床干预手段的多种声音。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 May-Jun;43 Suppl 1:58-68. doi: 10.1080/13682820701698093.
4
'Now it is about me having to learn something ….' Partners' experiences with a Dutch conversation partner training programme (PACT).“现在是关于我必须要学习某些东西……”伴侣参与荷兰语对话伙伴培训项目(PACT)的经历。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Mar;52(2):143-154. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12248. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
Using others' words: conversational use of reported speech by individuals with aphasia and their communication partners.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):137-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/011).
6
ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings.ImPACT:荷兰康复环境中失语症对话伙伴训练的多方面实施
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(1):76-89. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1243160. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Collaborative discourse facilitates efficient communication and new learning in amnesia.协作性话语有助于失忆症患者进行高效沟通和产生新的学习。
Brain Lang. 2008 Jul;106(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
8
Some ways of optimization of aphasics rehabilitation.失语症康复的一些优化方法。
Int J Rehabil Res. 1980;3(2):183-90. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198006000-00004.
9
Distributed impact of cognitive-communication impairment: Disruptions in the use of definite references when speaking to individuals with amnesia.认知交流障碍的分布性影响:与失忆症患者交谈时限定性指称使用的中断。
Aphasiology. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):675-687. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.536841.
10
Negotiation of identity in group therapy for aphasia: the Aphasia Café.失语症群体治疗中的身份认同协商:失语症咖啡馆
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):312-23. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.507616.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparty Communication: A New Direction in Characterizing the Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Social Communication.多方沟通:表征创伤性脑损伤对社交沟通影响的新方向。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jun 26;34(3S):1896-1909. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00151. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Perspectives on the semantics/pragmatics debate: insights from aphasia research.语义学/语用学辩论的视角:失语症研究的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 29;14:1250170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1250170. eCollection 2023.
3
What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.
功能性沟通是什么?应用于失语症康复的现实世界沟通的理论框架。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):937-973. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2.
4
Gesture height reflects common ground status even in patients with amnesia.即使是失忆症患者,手势高度也能反映共同基础状态。
Brain Lang. 2019 Mar;190:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
Enriching Communicative Environments: Leveraging Advances in Neuroplasticity for Improving Outcomes in Neurogenic Communication Disorders.丰富交流环境:利用神经可塑性进展改善神经源性语言障碍的预后。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):216-229. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0157.
6
Beyond utterances: distributed cognition as a framework for studying discourse in adults with acquired brain injury.超越言语表达:分布式认知作为研究后天性脑损伤成人话语的框架
Semin Speech Lang. 2012 Feb;33(1):44-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1301162. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage does not impair the development and use of common ground in social interaction: implications for cognitive theory of mind.腹内侧前额叶皮层损伤不会损害社会互动中共同基础的发展和使用:对认知心理理论的启示。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(1):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
8
Distributed impact of cognitive-communication impairment: Disruptions in the use of definite references when speaking to individuals with amnesia.认知交流障碍的分布性影响:与失忆症患者交谈时限定性指称使用的中断。
Aphasiology. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):675-687. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.536841.
9
The use of definite references signals declarative memory: evidence from patients with hippocampal amnesia.明确指代的使用表明了陈述性记忆:来自海马体遗忘症患者的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):666-73. doi: 10.1177/0956797611404897. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
10
Collaborative discourse facilitates efficient communication and new learning in amnesia.协作性话语有助于失忆症患者进行高效沟通和产生新的学习。
Brain Lang. 2008 Jul;106(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Dec 19.