Serino Giovanni, Biancu Salvatore, Iezzi Giovanna, Piattelli Adriano
Private Practice, Rome, Italy Private Practice, Cagliari, Italy Dental School, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):651-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x.
The placement of different graft materials and/or the use of occlusive membranes to cover the extraction socket entrance are techniques aimed at preserving/reducing alveolar ridge resorption. The use of grafting materials in fresh extraction sockets has, however, been questioned because particles of the grafted material have been found in alveolar sockets 6-9 months following their insertion.
The aims of the study were to (i). evaluate whether alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction could be prevented or reduced by the application of a bioabsorbable polylactide-polyglycolide sponge used as a space filler, compared to natural healing by clot formation, and (ii). evaluate histologically the amount and quality of bone tissue formed in the sockets, 6 months after the use of the bioabsorbable material.
Thirty-six patients, undergoing periodontal therapy, participated in this study. All patients were scheduled for extraction of one or more compromised teeth. Following elevation of full-thickness flaps and extraction of teeth, measurements were taken to evaluate the distance between three landmarks (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal) on individually prefabricated stents, and the alveolar crest. Twenty-six alveolar sockets (test) were filled with a bioabsorbable polylactide-polyglycolide acid sponge (Fisiograft), while 13 sockets (controls) were allowed to heal without any filling material. The flaps were sutured with no attempt to achieve primary closure of the surgical wound. Re-entry for implant surgery was performed 6 months following the extractions. Thirteen biopsies (10 test and three control sites) were harvested from the sites scheduled for implant placement.
The clinical measurements at 6 months revealed, in the mesial-buccal site, a loss of bone height of 0.2 mm (1.4 SD) in the test and 0.6 mm (1.1 SD) in the controls; in the mid-buccal portion a gain of 1.3 mm (1.9 SD) in the test and a loss of 0.8 mm (1.6 SD) in the controls; and in the distal portion a loss of 0.1 mm (1.1 SD) in the test and of 0.8 (1.5 SD) mm in the controls. The biopsies harvested from the test sites revealed that the new bone formed at 6 months was mineralized, mature and well structured. Particles of the grafted material could not be identified in any of the 10 test biopsies. The bone formed in the control sites was also mature and well structured.
The results of this study indicate that alveolar bone resorption following tooth extraction may be prevented or reduced by the use of a bioabsorbable synthetic sponge of polylactide-polyglycolide acid. The quality of bone formed seemed to be optimal for dental implant insertion.
放置不同的移植材料和/或使用封闭膜覆盖拔牙创口是旨在保留/减少牙槽嵴吸收的技术。然而,在新鲜拔牙创中使用移植材料受到了质疑,因为在植入后6 - 9个月的牙槽窝中发现了移植材料颗粒。
本研究的目的是:(i). 评估与通过血凝块形成的自然愈合相比,使用生物可吸收的聚丙交酯-聚乙交酯海绵作为空间填充材料是否可以预防或减少拔牙后的牙槽嵴吸收;(ii). 从组织学角度评估使用生物可吸收材料6个月后牙槽窝内形成的骨组织的数量和质量。
36名接受牙周治疗的患者参与了本研究。所有患者均计划拔除一颗或多颗患牙。在掀起全厚瓣并拔牙后,测量在单独预制的支架上三个标志点(近中颊侧、颊侧中点、远中颊侧)与牙槽嵴之间的距离。26个牙槽窝(试验组)填充生物可吸收的聚丙交酯-聚乙交酯酸海绵(Fisiograft),而13个牙槽窝(对照组)不使用任何填充材料任其愈合。瓣进行缝合,不试图实现手术创口的一期闭合。拔牙后6个月进行种植手术再次切开。从计划种植的部位获取13份活检标本(10个试验组部位和3个对照组部位)。
6个月时的临床测量显示,在近中颊侧部位,试验组骨高度丧失0.2 mm(标准差1.4),对照组为0.6 mm(标准差1.1);在颊侧中点部分,试验组骨高度增加1.3 mm(标准差1.9),对照组丧失0.8 mm(标准差1.6);在远中部分,试验组骨高度丧失0.1 mm(标准差1.1),对照组为0.8 mm(标准差1.5)。从试验组部位获取的活检标本显示,6个月时形成的新骨已矿化、成熟且结构良好。在10份试验组活检标本中均未发现移植材料颗粒。对照组部位形成的骨也成熟且结构良好。
本研究结果表明,使用生物可吸收的聚丙交酯-聚乙交酯酸合成海绵可预防或减少拔牙后的牙槽骨吸收。形成的骨质量似乎最适合植入牙种植体。