Yager Joel, Bienenfeld David
Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5326, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2003 Fall;27(3):174-81. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.27.3.174.
The Residency Review Committee (RRC) for Psychiatry has mandated that training programs "must demonstrate that residents have achieved competency in at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy."
To analyze the extent to which programs can realistically demonstrate that residents have achieved summative competency in these modalities.
We briefly review methods from other fields for assuring procedural competence, review methods available to psychiatric educators for assuring competencies in psychotherapy, and assess these methods for their adequacy.
Available and foreseeable assessment methods are incapable of demonstrating that residents achieve summative competency in the five specified psychotherapies or of definitively distinguishing potentially dangerous practitioners from safe practitioners. At best, educators may be able to assure formative competencies, including mastery of core knowledge of the psychotherapies, actual undertaking of these psychotherapies, and adequate performance in selected elements of these psychotherapies.
Since it is unrealistic to assume that training programs will ever be able to confirm summative competencies in these psychotherapies, we advise programs to define precisely the levels of formative competence they expect, and design curriculum and measures accordingly. Further, we urge the RRC to revise their requirements to address expectations more honestly, and to re-state the expected competencies more modestly. We believe that the RRC can expect programs to show that all residents can demonstrate knowledge about the evidence base, theories and rules of practice supporting at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy. We also believe that programs might be asked to demonstrate by means of patient logs and other forms of documentation that all residents have at least conducted such types of psychotherapy under qualified supervision.
精神病学住院医师评审委员会(RRC)规定,培训项目“必须证明住院医师至少在以下治疗形式方面具备能力:短期治疗、认知行为疗法、心理治疗与精神药理学联合治疗、精神动力学治疗和支持性治疗”。
分析各项目能够切实证明住院医师在这些治疗方式上达到总结性能力的程度。
我们简要回顾其他领域确保程序能力的方法,审视精神科教育工作者可用于确保心理治疗能力的方法,并评估这些方法的充分性。
现有的和可预见的评估方法无法证明住院医师在五种指定心理治疗中达到总结性能力,也无法明确区分潜在危险的从业者和安全的从业者。充其量,教育工作者或许能够确保形成性能力,包括掌握心理治疗的核心知识、实际开展这些心理治疗,以及在这些心理治疗的选定要素中表现良好。
鉴于认为培训项目能够确认这些心理治疗的总结性能力是不现实的,我们建议各项目精确界定他们期望的形成性能力水平,并相应地设计课程和评估措施。此外,我们敦促RRC修订其要求,更诚实地对待期望,并更适度地重新阐述预期能力。我们认为,RRC可以期望各项目表明所有住院医师能够展示关于支持至少以下治疗形式的循证基础、理论和实践规则的知识:短期治疗、认知行为疗法、心理治疗与精神药理学联合治疗、精神动力学治疗和支持性治疗。我们还认为,可以要求各项目通过患者记录和其他形式的文件证明所有住院医师至少在合格监督下进行过此类心理治疗。