Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织关于酒精和药物使用障碍工具的信效度研究:方法与结果概述

WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results.

作者信息

Ustün B, Compton W, Mager D, Babor T, Baiyewu O, Chatterji S, Cottler L, Göğüş A, Mavreas V, Peters L, Pull C, Saunders J, Smeets R, Stipec M R, Vrasti R, Hasin D, Room R, Van den Brink W, Regier D, Blaine J, Grant B F, Sartorius N

机构信息

Unit on Epidemiology, Classification and Assessment, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):161-9. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00087-2.

Abstract

The WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments in an international study which has taken place in centres in ten countries, aiming to test the reliability and validity of three diagnostic instruments for alcohol and drug use disorders: the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) and a special version of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview schedule-alcohol/drug-revised (AUDADIS-ADR). The purpose of the reliability and validity (R&V) study is to further develop the alcohol and drug sections of these instruments so that a range of substance-related diagnoses can be made in a systematic, consistent, and reliable way. The study focuses on new criteria proposed in the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and the fourth revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) for dependence, harmful use and abuse categories for alcohol and psychoactive substance use disorders. A systematic study including a scientifically rigorous measure of reliability (i.e. 1 week test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e. comparison between clinical and non-clinical measures) has been undertaken. Results have yielded useful information on reliability and validity of these instruments at diagnosis, criteria and question level. Overall the diagnostic concordance coefficients (kappa, kappa) were very good for dependence disorders (0.7-0.9), but were somewhat lower for the abuse and harmful use categories. The comparisons among instruments and independent clinical evaluations and debriefing interviews gave important information about possible sources of unreliability, and provided useful clues on the applicability and consistency of nosological concepts across cultures.

摘要

世界卫生组织在十个国家的研究中心开展了一项关于酒精和药物使用障碍工具可靠性和有效性的国际研究,旨在测试三种酒精和药物使用障碍诊断工具的可靠性和有效性:综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)、神经精神病学临床评估量表(SCAN)以及酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈表的一个特殊版本——酒精/药物修订版(AUDADIS-ADR)。可靠性和有效性(R&V)研究的目的是进一步完善这些工具中的酒精和药物部分,以便能够以系统、一致且可靠的方式做出一系列与物质相关的诊断。该研究聚焦于《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中针对酒精和精神活性物质使用障碍的依赖、有害使用和滥用类别提出的新标准。已开展了一项系统研究,包括对可靠性(即1周重测信度)和有效性(即临床与非临床测量之间的比较)进行科学严谨的测量。研究结果在诊断、标准和问题层面就这些工具的可靠性和有效性提供了有用信息。总体而言,依赖障碍的诊断一致性系数(kappa值)非常好(0.7 - 0.9),但滥用和有害使用类别的系数略低。工具之间的比较以及独立临床评估和汇报访谈提供了关于可能不可靠来源的重要信息,并就疾病分类概念在不同文化中的适用性和一致性提供了有用线索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验