• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项双盲随机研究,比较阿奇霉素短疗程(3天)与阿莫西林5天疗程对慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效和安全性。

Double-blind randomized study comparing the efficacies and safeties of a short (3-day) course of azithromycin and a 5-day course of amoxicillin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Mertens J C, van Barneveld P W, Asin H R, Ligtvoet E, Visser M R, Branger T, Hoepelman A I

机构信息

Elisabeth's Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jul;36(7):1456-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.7.1456.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.36.7.1456
PMID:1324645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC191603/
Abstract

The efficacies and safeties of a three-dose regimen of azithromycin (500 mg once daily for 3 days) and a 15-dose regimen of amoxicillin (500 mg three times daily for 5 days) were compared in a double-blind manner in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. A total of 92% of patients suffered a type 1 exacerbation. Treatment success, defined as cure or major improvement, was achieved in all patients in the azithromycin group by day 5, compared with 23 (92%) of 25 patients in the amoxicillin group. On day 12, these data were 24 of 25 (96%) in the azithromycin group and 20 of 25 (80%) in the amoxicillin group (results were not significantly different). Several pathogens were isolated (MIC ranges [micrograms per milliliter] in parentheses): Haemophilus influenzae or Haemophilus parainfluenzae was isolated 23 times (azithromycin, less than or equal to 0.06 to 32; amoxicillin, 0.12 to 2); Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from 11 patients (azithromcyin, less than or equal to 0.06 greater than 256; amoxicillin, less than or equal to 0.06 to 0.25); Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis was isolated from eight patients (azithromycin, less than or equal to 0.06; amoxicillin, less than or equal to 0.06 to 16); and other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from eight patients. One patient treated with azithromycin had Legionella pneumophila pneumonia, and another in that group had a significant rise in titer of antibody against influenza A virus. One patient treated with amoxicillin also had a significant rise in titer of antibody against influenza A virus. Microbiological response rates were comparable. One patient who received azithromycin developed abnormal liver function. Two patients treated with amoxicillin developed abnormal liver functions, one developed exanthema, and one treatment was stopped because of nausea. It is concluded that a three-dose (3-day) regimen of azithromycin is as effective clinically and microbiologically as a 15-dose (5-day) regimen of amoxicillin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

摘要

在慢性支气管炎急性加重期患者中,以双盲方式比较了阿奇霉素三剂量方案(500毫克,每日1次,共3天)和阿莫西林15剂量方案(500毫克,每日3次,共5天)的疗效和安全性。共有92%的患者发生1型加重。阿奇霉素组所有患者在第5天均实现了定义为治愈或显著改善的治疗成功,而阿莫西林组25例患者中有23例(92%)实现了治疗成功。在第12天,阿奇霉素组25例中有24例(96%),阿莫西林组25例中有20例(80%)(结果无显著差异)。分离出几种病原体(括号内为最低抑菌浓度范围[微克/毫升]):流感嗜血杆菌或副流感嗜血杆菌分离出23次(阿奇霉素,≤0.06至32;阿莫西林,0.12至2);11例患者分离出肺炎链球菌(阿奇霉素,≤0.06至>256;阿莫西林,≤0.06至0.25);8例患者分离出卡他莫拉菌(莫拉菌属[布兰汉菌属])(阿奇霉素,≤0.06;阿莫西林,≤0.06至16);8例患者分离出肠杆菌科其他成员。1例接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者发生嗜肺军团菌肺炎,该组另1例患者甲型流感病毒抗体滴度显著升高。1例接受阿莫西林治疗的患者甲型流感病毒抗体滴度也显著升高。微生物学反应率相当。1例接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者出现肝功能异常。2例接受阿莫西林治疗的患者出现肝功能异常,1例出现皮疹,1例因恶心而停药。结论是,在治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期时,阿奇霉素三剂量(3天)方案在临床和微生物学上与阿莫西林15剂量(5天)方案同样有效。

相似文献

1
Double-blind randomized study comparing the efficacies and safeties of a short (3-day) course of azithromycin and a 5-day course of amoxicillin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.一项双盲随机研究,比较阿奇霉素短疗程(3天)与阿莫西林5天疗程对慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jul;36(7):1456-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.7.1456.
2
A single-blind comparison of three-day azithromycin and ten-day co-amoxiclav treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.急性下呼吸道感染的三日阿奇霉素与十日阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗的单盲比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:147-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.147.
3
A short (3-day) course of azithromycin tablets versus a 10-day course of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections and effects on long-term outcome.阿奇霉素片短期(3天)疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸(复方阿莫西林)10天疗程治疗成人下呼吸道感染的疗效及对长期预后的影响。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997 Jan;9(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(97)00043-5.
4
Double-blind, comparative study of rufloxacin once daily versus amoxicillin three times a day in treatment of outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.每日一次芦氟沙星与每日三次阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期门诊患者的双盲对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Nov;37(11):2298-306. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2298.
5
Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1999 Apr;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.2.119.
6
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
7
Once-daily, 3-day azithromycin versus a three-times-daily, 10-day course of co-amoxiclav in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections: results of a randomized, double-blind comparative study.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:93-101. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.93.
8
A randomized, multicenter, double blind, double dummy trial of single dose azithromycin versus high dose amoxicillin for treatment of uncomplicated acute otitis media.单剂量阿奇霉素与高剂量阿莫西林治疗非复杂性急性中耳炎的随机、多中心、双盲、双模拟试验
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Feb;24(2):153-61. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000151024.11703.4a.
9
The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)莫西沙星与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的安全性和有效性。
Respir Med. 2000 Nov;94(11):1029-37. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0927.
10
Comparative study of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 May;10(5):437-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01968024.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the Mechanisms Behind Macrolide Antibiotic-Induced Liver Injury Using Quantitative Systems Toxicology Modeling.利用定量系统毒理学模型分析大环内酯类抗生素肝损伤的作用机制。
Pharm Res. 2019 Feb 7;36(3):48. doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2582-y.
2
Network meta-analysis of success rate and safety in antibiotic treatments of bronchitis.支气管炎抗生素治疗成功率和安全性的网状Meta分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 9;12:2391-2405. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S139521. eCollection 2017.
3
Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素用于治疗急性下呼吸道感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 8;2015(3):CD001954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub4.
4
Efficacy of amoxycillin versus amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute exacerbations of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease in primary care.阿莫西林与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗基层医疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的疗效。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:45-53. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
5
Use of azithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD.阿奇霉素在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期治疗中的应用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(4):515-20. doi: 10.2147/copd.s1189.
6
Viral and atypical pathogens as causes of type 1 acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.病毒及非典型病原体作为慢性支气管炎1型急性加重的病因
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1997;3(5):513-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00299.x.
7
Choosing the right macrolide antibiotic. A guide to selection.选择合适的大环内酯类抗生素。选择指南。
Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):349-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00002.
8
Azithromycin. A review of its pharmacological properties and use as 3-day therapy in respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素。对其药理特性及在呼吸道感染中作为三日疗法应用的综述。
Drugs. 1996 Mar;51(3):483-505. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651030-00013.
9
Pyrimethamine plus azithromycin for treatment of acute toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS.乙胺嘧啶联合阿奇霉素治疗艾滋病患者的急性弓形虫脑炎
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;12(11):853-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02000407.
10
Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.阿奇霉素:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及临床疗效综述
Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00007.

本文引用的文献

1
Respiratory viral infections in hospital patients with chronic bronchitis. Observations during periods of exacerbation and quiescence.慢性支气管炎住院患者的呼吸道病毒感染。病情加重期与缓解期的观察
Chest. 1973 Mar;63(3):336-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.63.3.336.
2
Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的抗生素治疗
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Feb;106(2):196-204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-2-196.
3
Comparative in vitro activity of the new oral macrolide azithromycin.新型口服大环内酯类药物阿奇霉素的体外活性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;7(4):541-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01962611.
4
Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against gram-negative organisms.阿奇霉素(CP - 62,993)的抗菌谱及作用方式,一种对革兰氏阴性菌效力增强的新型15元环大环内酯类抗生素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Dec;31(12):1939-47. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1939.
5
A double-blind comparison of low-dose ofloxacin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.低剂量氧氟沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的双盲对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Nov;26 Suppl D:75-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_d.75.
6
Azithromycin concentrations at the sites of pulmonary infection.肺部感染部位的阿奇霉素浓度。
Eur Respir J. 1990 Sep;3(8):886-90.
7
Comparative study of clarithromycin and ampicillin in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:91-100. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.91.
8
Prophylactic and therapeutic activities of azithromycin in a mouse model of pneumococcal pneumonia.阿奇霉素在肺炎球菌肺炎小鼠模型中的预防和治疗作用
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jun;35(6):1024-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.6.1024.
9
Multicenter evaluation of azithromycin and cefaclor in acute lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与头孢克洛用于急性下呼吸道感染的多中心评估
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):31S-35S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90399-i.
10
Comparative study of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 May;10(5):437-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01968024.