Suppr超能文献

采用阈值回归模型研究香烟价格上涨对28个欧盟国家香烟消费、烟草税收收入及吸烟相关死亡的影响。

The effects of a rise in cigarette price on cigarette consumption, tobacco taxation revenues, and of smoking-related deaths in 28 EU countries-- applying threshold regression modelling.

作者信息

Yeh Chun-Yuan, Schafferer Christian, Lee Jie-Min, Ho Li-Ming, Hsieh Chi-Jung

机构信息

Department of International Trade, Overseas Chinese University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung Marine University, 142, Hai-Chuan Rd. Nan-Tzu, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 21;17(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4685-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

European Union public healthcare expenditure on treating smoking and attributable diseases is estimated at over €25bn annually. The reduction of tobacco consumption has thus become one of the major social policies of the EU. This study investigates the effects of price hikes on cigarette consumption, tobacco tax revenues and smoking-caused deaths in 28 EU countries.

METHODS

Employing panel data for the years 2005 to 2014 from Euromonitor International, the World Bank and the World Health Organization, we used income as a threshold variable and applied threshold regression modelling to estimate the elasticity of cigarette prices and to simulate the effect of price fluctuations.

RESULTS

The results showed that there was an income threshold effect on cigarette prices in the 28 EU countries that had a gross national income (GNI) per capita lower than US$5418, with a maximum cigarette price elasticity of -1.227. The results of the simulated analysis showed that a rise of 10% in cigarette price would significantly reduce cigarette consumption as well the total death toll caused by smoking in all the observed countries, but would be most effective in Bulgaria and Romania, followed by Latvia and Poland. Additionally, an increase in the number of MPOWER tobacco control policies at the highest level of achievment would help reduce cigarette consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that all EU countries levy higher tobacco taxes to increase cigarette prices, and thus in effect reduce cigarette consumption. The subsequent increase in tobacco tax revenues would be instrumental in covering expenditures related to tobacco prevention and control programs.

摘要

背景

欧盟每年用于治疗吸烟及相关疾病的公共医疗支出估计超过250亿欧元。因此,减少烟草消费已成为欧盟的主要社会政策之一。本研究调查了28个欧盟国家香烟价格上涨对香烟消费、烟草税收收入和吸烟导致的死亡人数的影响。

方法

利用来自欧睿国际、世界银行和世界卫生组织的2005年至2014年的面板数据,我们将收入作为阈值变量,并应用阈值回归模型来估计香烟价格的弹性,并模拟价格波动的影响。

结果

结果表明,在人均国民总收入低于5418美元的28个欧盟国家中,香烟价格存在收入阈值效应,最大香烟价格弹性为-1.227。模拟分析结果表明,香烟价格上涨10%将显著减少所有观察国家的香烟消费以及吸烟导致的总死亡人数,但在保加利亚和罗马尼亚最为有效,其次是拉脱维亚和波兰。此外,在最高成就水平上增加MPOWER烟草控制政策的数量将有助于减少香烟消费。

结论

建议所有欧盟国家提高烟草税以提高香烟价格,从而有效减少香烟消费。随后烟草税收收入的增加将有助于支付与烟草预防和控制计划相关的支出。

相似文献

3
The effect of cigarette price increases on cigarette consumption, tax revenue, and smoking-related death in Africa from 1999 to 2013.
Int J Public Health. 2017 Nov;62(8):899-909. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0980-7. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
10
The distribution of cigarette prices under different tax structures: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project.
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i23-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050966. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

3
Global burden, trends, and disparities in kidney cancer attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;12:1506542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1506542. eCollection 2024.
5
Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in Nepal from 1990 to 2019: The Global Burden of Disease Study, 2019.
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2023 Jun 19;2023:3700094. doi: 10.1155/2023/3700094. eCollection 2023.
6
Macroeconomic impact of tobacco taxation in Indonesia.
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s108-s114. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057735.
8
As countries improve their cigarette tax policy, cigarette consumption declines.
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e91-e96. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057486.
9
A Study on China's Tobacco Taxation and Its Influencing Factor on Economic Growth.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:832040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832040. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the impact of raising tobacco taxes on public health and finance.
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Apr 1;94(4):250-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.164707. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
2
Tobacco control in Poland-successes and challenges.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2014 Oct;3(5):280-5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.09.12.
3
Smoking-related deaths averted due to three years of policy progress.
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jul 1;91(7):509-18. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.113878.
4
The cross-effects of cigarette and betel nut consumption in Taiwan: have tax increases made a difference?
Health Policy Plan. 2011 May;26(3):266-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq041. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
5
Raising taxes to reduce smoking prevalence in the US: a simulation of the anticipated health and economic impacts.
Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.020. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
6
Higher smoking prevalence in urban compared to non-urban areas: time trends in six European countries.
Health Place. 2007 Sep;13(3):702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.001. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities.
Health Econ. 2003 Oct;12(10):821-35. doi: 10.1002/hec.765.
9
Effects of cigarette tax on cigarette consumption and the Chinese economy.
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):105-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.105.
10
Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter?
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00451-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验