• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effects of a rise in cigarette price on cigarette consumption, tobacco taxation revenues, and of smoking-related deaths in 28 EU countries-- applying threshold regression modelling.采用阈值回归模型研究香烟价格上涨对28个欧盟国家香烟消费、烟草税收收入及吸烟相关死亡的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 21;17(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4685-x.
2
Raising cigarette excise tax to reduce consumption in low-and middle-income countries of the Asia-Pacific region:a simulation of the anticipated health and taxation revenues impacts.提高亚太地区中低收入国家的烟草消费税以减少消费:对预期健康和税收收入影响的模拟。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):1187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6096-z.
3
The effect of cigarette price increases on cigarette consumption, tax revenue, and smoking-related death in Africa from 1999 to 2013.1999 年至 2013 年期间,非洲卷烟价格上涨对卷烟消费、税收和与吸烟相关死亡的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2017 Nov;62(8):899-909. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0980-7. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
A simulation impact evaluation of a cigarette excise tax increase on licit and illicit cigarette consumption and tax revenue in 36 European countries.对 36 个欧洲国家增加香烟消费税对合法和非法香烟消费及税收的模拟影响评估。
Public Health. 2018 Sep;162:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Impact of cigarette price differences across the entire European Union on cross-border purchase of tobacco products among adult cigarette smokers.整个欧盟范围内香烟价格差异对成年吸烟者跨境购买烟草制品的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):333-40. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052015. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
The health and economic burden of smoking in 12 Latin American countries and the potential effect of increasing tobacco taxes: an economic modelling study.12 个拉丁美洲国家的吸烟带来的健康和经济负担,以及提高烟草税的潜在影响:一项经济建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1282-e1294. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30311-9.
8
Price and income elasticities of demand for cigarette consumption: what is the association of price and economic activity with cigarette consumption in Spain from 1957 to 2016?香烟消费的需求价格和收入弹性:从 1957 年到 2016 年,西班牙的价格和经济活动与香烟消费之间有何关联?
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:275-282. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.059. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.比较香烟最低限价和消费税政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的预期影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
10
The distribution of cigarette prices under different tax structures: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project.不同税收结构下香烟价格的分布:国际烟草控制政策评估(ITC)项目的研究结果。
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i23-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050966. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco Control Interventions in Nigeria from 2012 to 2022: A Blueprint to Reduce Smoking Prevalence: A Systematic Review.2012年至2022年尼日利亚的烟草控制干预措施:降低吸烟率的蓝图:一项系统综述
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jul;54(7):1377-1388. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i7.19144.
2
Biomarkers of Nicotine and Tobacco Carcinogen Exposure in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Black Adults Receiving a Brief Smoking Reduction Intervention.接受简短戒烟干预的社会经济地位不利的黑人成年人中尼古丁和烟草致癌物暴露的生物标志物
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jun 3;34(6):982-989. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1789.
3
Global burden, trends, and disparities in kidney cancer attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年因吸烟导致的肾癌的全球负担、趋势及差异
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;12:1506542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1506542. eCollection 2024.
4
Perceptions of Tobacco Price Policy among Students from Sapienza University of Rome: Can This Policy Mitigate Smoking Addiction and Its Health Impacts?罗马第一大学学生对烟草价格政策的看法:该政策能否减轻吸烟成瘾及其对健康的影响?
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 4;12(9):944. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090944.
5
Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in Nepal from 1990 to 2019: The Global Burden of Disease Study, 2019.尼泊尔 1990 年至 2019 年心血管疾病负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究。
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2023 Jun 19;2023:3700094. doi: 10.1155/2023/3700094. eCollection 2023.
6
Macroeconomic impact of tobacco taxation in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烟草税收的宏观经济影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s108-s114. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057735.
7
Alcohol Policies Affect Drinking Patterns-A Potentially New and Harmful Drinking Pattern in Consumers of Small Vodka Bottles (SVB) in Poland.酒精政策影响饮酒模式——波兰小瓶伏特加(SVB)消费者中一种潜在的新的有害饮酒模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417047.
8
As countries improve their cigarette tax policy, cigarette consumption declines.随着国家提高香烟税收政策,香烟消费下降。
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e91-e96. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057486.
9
A Study on China's Tobacco Taxation and Its Influencing Factor on Economic Growth.中国烟草税收及其对经济增长的影响因素研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:832040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832040. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of Message Approach and Image Size on Pictorial Health Warning Effectiveness on Cigarette Pack in Indonesia: A Mixed Factorial Experiment.印尼烟包图形健康警示语效果的信息途径和图像大小影响的混合析因实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136854.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the impact of raising tobacco taxes on public health and finance.模拟提高烟草税对公众健康和财政的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Apr 1;94(4):250-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.164707. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
2
Tobacco control in Poland-successes and challenges.波兰的烟草控制:成就与挑战。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2014 Oct;3(5):280-5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.09.12.
3
Smoking-related deaths averted due to three years of policy progress.由于三年的政策进展,与吸烟有关的死亡人数得以避免。
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jul 1;91(7):509-18. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.113878.
4
The cross-effects of cigarette and betel nut consumption in Taiwan: have tax increases made a difference?台湾地区香烟和槟榔消费的交叉影响:增税有效果吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2011 May;26(3):266-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq041. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
5
Raising taxes to reduce smoking prevalence in the US: a simulation of the anticipated health and economic impacts.提高税收以降低美国的吸烟率:对预期健康和经济影响的模拟
Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.020. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
6
Higher smoking prevalence in urban compared to non-urban areas: time trends in six European countries.与非城市地区相比,城市地区吸烟率更高:六个欧洲国家的时间趋势。
Health Place. 2007 Sep;13(3):702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.001. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities.香烟需求:弹性的荟萃分析。
Health Econ. 2003 Oct;12(10):821-35. doi: 10.1002/hec.765.
8
Residential area deprivation predicts smoking habit independently of individual educational level and occupational social class. A cross sectional study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk).居住地区贫困状况独立于个人教育水平和职业社会阶层,可预测吸烟习惯。欧洲癌症调查诺福克队列(EPIC - 诺福克)的一项横断面研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):270-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.270.
9
Effects of cigarette tax on cigarette consumption and the Chinese economy.香烟税对香烟消费及中国经济的影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):105-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.105.
10
Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter?步行、锻炼与吸烟:邻里环境有影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00451-7.

采用阈值回归模型研究香烟价格上涨对28个欧盟国家香烟消费、烟草税收收入及吸烟相关死亡的影响。

The effects of a rise in cigarette price on cigarette consumption, tobacco taxation revenues, and of smoking-related deaths in 28 EU countries-- applying threshold regression modelling.

作者信息

Yeh Chun-Yuan, Schafferer Christian, Lee Jie-Min, Ho Li-Ming, Hsieh Chi-Jung

机构信息

Department of International Trade, Overseas Chinese University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung Marine University, 142, Hai-Chuan Rd. Nan-Tzu, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 21;17(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4685-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-017-4685-x
PMID:28931379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607587/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

European Union public healthcare expenditure on treating smoking and attributable diseases is estimated at over €25bn annually. The reduction of tobacco consumption has thus become one of the major social policies of the EU. This study investigates the effects of price hikes on cigarette consumption, tobacco tax revenues and smoking-caused deaths in 28 EU countries.

METHODS

Employing panel data for the years 2005 to 2014 from Euromonitor International, the World Bank and the World Health Organization, we used income as a threshold variable and applied threshold regression modelling to estimate the elasticity of cigarette prices and to simulate the effect of price fluctuations.

RESULTS

The results showed that there was an income threshold effect on cigarette prices in the 28 EU countries that had a gross national income (GNI) per capita lower than US$5418, with a maximum cigarette price elasticity of -1.227. The results of the simulated analysis showed that a rise of 10% in cigarette price would significantly reduce cigarette consumption as well the total death toll caused by smoking in all the observed countries, but would be most effective in Bulgaria and Romania, followed by Latvia and Poland. Additionally, an increase in the number of MPOWER tobacco control policies at the highest level of achievment would help reduce cigarette consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that all EU countries levy higher tobacco taxes to increase cigarette prices, and thus in effect reduce cigarette consumption. The subsequent increase in tobacco tax revenues would be instrumental in covering expenditures related to tobacco prevention and control programs.

摘要

背景

欧盟每年用于治疗吸烟及相关疾病的公共医疗支出估计超过250亿欧元。因此,减少烟草消费已成为欧盟的主要社会政策之一。本研究调查了28个欧盟国家香烟价格上涨对香烟消费、烟草税收收入和吸烟导致的死亡人数的影响。

方法

利用来自欧睿国际、世界银行和世界卫生组织的2005年至2014年的面板数据,我们将收入作为阈值变量,并应用阈值回归模型来估计香烟价格的弹性,并模拟价格波动的影响。

结果

结果表明,在人均国民总收入低于5418美元的28个欧盟国家中,香烟价格存在收入阈值效应,最大香烟价格弹性为-1.227。模拟分析结果表明,香烟价格上涨10%将显著减少所有观察国家的香烟消费以及吸烟导致的总死亡人数,但在保加利亚和罗马尼亚最为有效,其次是拉脱维亚和波兰。此外,在最高成就水平上增加MPOWER烟草控制政策的数量将有助于减少香烟消费。

结论

建议所有欧盟国家提高烟草税以提高香烟价格,从而有效减少香烟消费。随后烟草税收收入的增加将有助于支付与烟草预防和控制计划相关的支出。