Suppr超能文献

硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉联合与单纯全身麻醉用于大肠吻合术的效果比较。一项前瞻性研究。

Effect of epidural and general anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia alone in large bowel anastomoses. A prospective study.

作者信息

Ryan P, Schweitzer S A, Woods R J

机构信息

Colorectal Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1992 Jan;158(1):45-9.

PMID:1348641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find out whether patients did better after operations that entailed a large bowel anastomosis if they were given combined epidural and general anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation rather than standard general anaesthesia with muscle relaxation and ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised trial.

SETTING

Specialist unit, teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

80 patients undergoing large bowel anastomoses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of chest infection, wound infection, anastomotic breakdown, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, median hospital stay and death.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups, but the results were better during the trial period (1985-89) than during the period 1978-83.

CONCLUSION

Factors that influence anastomotic healing are complex and improved surgical techniques, postoperative monitoring and patient care may account for the improvement in results compared with the earlier period.

摘要

目的

探讨接受大肠吻合术的患者,采用硬膜外麻醉联合全身麻醉并自主通气,与采用标准全身麻醉并肌肉松弛及机械通气相比,术后恢复情况是否更好。

设计

前瞻性随机试验。

地点

教学医院的专科病房。

研究对象

80例行大肠吻合术的患者。

主要观察指标

肺部感染、伤口感染、吻合口漏、尿路感染、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、中位住院时间及死亡发生率。

结果

两组之间无差异,但试验期间(1985 - 1989年)的结果优于1978 - 1983年期间。

结论

影响吻合口愈合的因素复杂,与早期相比,手术技术的改进、术后监测及患者护理的改善可能是结果改善的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验