Suppr超能文献

栗疫病菌(Cryphonectria parasitica)的DNA指纹图谱及群体结构分析

DNA fingerprinting and analysis of population structure in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica.

作者信息

Milgroom M G, Lipari S E, Powell W A

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-5908.

出版信息

Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):297-306. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.297.

Abstract

We analyzed DNA fingerprints in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, for stability, inheritance, linkage and variability in a natural population. DNA fingerprints resulting from hybridization with a dispersed moderately repetitive DNA sequence of C. parasitica in plasmid pMS5.1 hybridized to 6-17 restriction fragments per individual isolate. In a laboratory cross and from progeny from a single perithecium collected from a field population, the presence/absence of 11 fragments in the laboratory cross and 12 fragments in the field progeny set segregated in 1:1 ratios. Two fragments in each progeny set cosegregated; no other linkage was detected among the segregating fragments. Mutations, identified by missing bands, were detected for only one fragment in which 4 of 43 progeny lacked a band present in both parents; no novel fragments were detected in any progeny. All other fragments appeared to be stably inherited. Hybridization patterns did not change during vegetative growth or sporulation. However, fingerprint patterns of single conidial isolates of strains EP155 and EP67 were found to be heterogenous due to mutations that occurred during culturing in the laboratory since these strains were first isolated in 1976-1977. In a population sample of 39 C. parasitica isolates, we found 33 different fingerprint patterns with pMS5.1. Most isolates differed from all other isolates by the presence or absence of several fragments. Six fingerprint patterns each occurred twice. Isolates with identical fingerprints occurred in cankers on the same chestnut stems three times; isolates within the other three pairs were isolated from cankers more than 5 m apart. The null hypothesis of random mating in this population could not be rejected if the six putative clones were removed from the analysis. Thus, a rough estimate of the clonal fraction of this population is 6 in 39 isolates (15.4%).

摘要

我们分析了栗疫病菌(Cryphonectria parasitica)的DNA指纹图谱,以研究其在自然种群中的稳定性、遗传性、连锁性和变异性。用质粒pMS5.1中栗疫病菌的一个分散的中度重复DNA序列杂交产生的DNA指纹图谱,每个分离菌株可与6 - 17个限制性片段杂交。在实验室杂交以及从田间种群采集的单个子囊壳的后代中,实验室杂交的11个片段和田间后代的12个片段的有无以1:1的比例分离。每个后代组中有两个片段共分离;在分离的片段中未检测到其他连锁关系。通过缺失条带鉴定的突变仅在一个片段中被检测到,43个后代中有4个缺乏双亲都有的条带;在任何后代中均未检测到新的条带。所有其他片段似乎都能稳定遗传。杂交模式在营养生长或孢子形成过程中没有变化。然而,菌株EP155和EP67的单个分生孢子分离物的指纹图谱由于自1976 - 1977年首次分离以来在实验室培养过程中发生的突变而呈现异质性。在39个栗疫病菌分离物的种群样本中,我们用pMS5.1发现了33种不同的指纹图谱。大多数分离物与所有其他分离物的区别在于几个片段的有无。六种指纹图谱各出现两次。指纹相同的分离物在同一栗树茎干的溃疡病斑中出现了三次;其他三对中的分离物是从相距超过5米的溃疡病斑中分离得到的。如果从分析中去除这六个假定的克隆,则不能拒绝该种群随机交配的零假设。因此,该种群克隆比例的粗略估计为39个分离物中有6个(15.4%)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Molecular marker technologies for plant improvement.植物改良的分子标记技术。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995 Jul;11(4):438-48. doi: 10.1007/BF00364619.

本文引用的文献

4
DNA fingerprinting in birds.鸟类中的DNA指纹识别
Nature. 1987;327(6118):149-52. doi: 10.1038/327149a0.
9
Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.通过DNA指纹图谱估计亲缘关系。
Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):584-99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040518.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验