Callosal and superior temporal sulcus contributions to receptive field properties in the macaque monkey's nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract.

To assess the functional contribution of the cortical input to the receptive field properties of nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and dorsal terminal nucleus (DTN) neurons, a first set of experiments evaluated the response properties of NOT-DTN cells in monkeys with split corpus callosum. With respect to visual latency, direction specificity, directional tuning width, velocity tuning, ocular dominance, and binocular interaction, they were indistinguishable from NOT-DTN neurons in normal monkeys. However, a clear difference was found regarding the extent of the receptive fields. Whereas, in normal monkeys, NOT-DTN receptive fields include the contralateral hemifield and the fovea as well as substantial parts of the ipsilateral visual field, receptive fields in callosum-split monkeys stop abruptly at, or close to, the vertical 0-meridian and do not extend into the ipsilateral visual field. In addition, the location of the highest sensitivity within the receptive fields in callosum-split monkeys is shifted away from the vertical 0-meridian in comparison to normal animals. In a second set of experiments, we antidromically identified cortical neurons within the superior temporal sulcus that project to the NOT-DTN. These neurons were found in area MT mostly near the border of MTp or MSTl. All of them are direction selective for ipsiversive stimulus movement, and their receptive fields extend substantially into the ipsilateral visual hemifield. Neurons with other preferred directions did not project to the NOT-DTN. These results contribute to the explanation of the ipsiversive directional deficits in slow eye movements after cortical lesions, as well as the asymmetries in optokinetic nystagmus with hemifield stimulation after transection of the corpus callosum. The more general implication of the results is that a particular function of a cortical area can only be understood by knowing its subcortical connections.