Bonzel T, Schmidt H, Sigwart U, Mertens H M, Gleichmann U
Z Kardiol. 1976 Dec;65(12):1088-108.
Left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPM) and enddiastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PADP) were simultaneously recorded in 19 subjects with normal left ventricular (LV) function, and in 109 patients with LV-dysfunction, 83 of whom were also studied during exercise. Patients with valvular heart disease or atrial fibrillation were excluded from this study. LVEDP and mean pulmonary capillary wedge (PCW) pressure were simultaneously recorded in 81 patients at rest, andin 16 patients also during exercise; the LV diastolic pressure prior to atrial contraction (LVPpreA) could accurately be identified in 45 patients at rest and in 23 patients with exercise. In contrast to the widely accepted opinion of others, the PADP (mean 8.2 +/- 2.2 mm Hg at rest and 12.3 +/- 3.4 mm Hg with exercise) showed a close approximation of LVEDP (10.0 +/- mm Hg at rest and 16.2 +/- 3.5 mm Hg with exercise) only in normal subjects at rest (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01 respectively). In patients with LV dysfunction there was no significant difference between PADP (11.7 +/- 4.5 mm Hg and 23.0 +/- 8.9 mm Hg), PCW (11.6 +/- 5.1 mm Hg and 24.1 +/- 11.9 mm Hg) and LVPpreA (12.5 +/- 5.5 and 21.5 +/- 7.7 mm Hg) at rest and during exercise. LVEDP could be estimated with sufficient accuracy only from the PAPM (18.9 +/- 6.5 and 35.7 +/- 10.8 mm Hg). The increase in LVEDP (14.7 +/- 7.7 mm Hg) with exercise was not significantly different from the increase in PAPM (16.8 +/- 7.1 mm Hg). There were highly significant correlations (p less than 0.001) between LVEDP and PADP (r = 0.85) as well as PAPM (r = 0.86) at rest and during exercise with the regressionline being closest to the line of identity for LVEDP and PAPM. The pressure gradient between LVEDP and PADP (LVEDP - PADP = 6.3 mm Hg with exercise) equaled the pressure increase in LV by atrial contraction (LVEDP - LVPpreA = 6.3 and 13.3 mm Hg). The pressure difference between PADP or PAPM and LVEDP remained constant despite marked variation of other hemodynamic parameters, e.g. stroke volume index (SVI), heart rate (HR) and cardiac index(CI). These data suggest that an elevated LVEDP is caused mainly by an augmented atrial contraction in patients with LV dysfunction at rest and with exercise. This mechanism precludes an enddiastolic pressure equilibrium between pulmonary artery and left ventricel. PAPM allows the best estimation of LVEDP independent from other hemodynamic variables.
对19名左心室(LV)功能正常的受试者以及109名左心室功能不全患者同时记录左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)、平均肺动脉压(PAPM)和舒张末期肺动脉压(PADP),其中83名左心室功能不全患者还在运动期间进行了研究。本研究排除了患有瓣膜性心脏病或心房颤动的患者。对81名患者在静息状态下同时记录LVEDP和平均肺毛细血管楔压(PCW),其中16名患者在运动期间也进行了记录;在45名静息状态患者和23名运动患者中能够准确识别心房收缩前的左心室舒张压(LVPpreA)。与其他人广泛接受的观点相反,PADP(静息时平均为8.2±2.2 mmHg,运动时为12.3±3.4 mmHg)仅在静息状态的正常受试者中与LVEDP(静息时为10.0± mmHg,运动时为16.2±3.5 mmHg)密切近似(分别为p<0.05和p<0.01)。在左心室功能不全患者中,静息和运动时PADP(11.7±4.5 mmHg和23.0±8.9 mmHg)、PCW(11.6±5.1 mmHg和24.1±11.9 mmHg)和LVPpreA(12.5±5.5和21.5±7.7 mmHg)之间无显著差异。仅根据PAPM(18.9±6.5和35.7±10.8 mmHg)就能足够准确地估计LVEDP。运动时LVEDP的升高(14.7±7.7 mmHg)与PAPM的升高(16.8±7.1 mmHg)无显著差异。静息和运动时LVEDP与PADP(r = 0.85)以及PAPM(r = 0.86)之间存在高度显著相关性(p<0.001),回归线最接近LVEDP和PAPM的恒等线。LVEDP与PADP之间的压力梯度(运动时LVEDP - PADP = 6.3 mmHg)等于心房收缩时左心室压力的升高(LVEDP - LVPpreA = 6.3和13.3 mmHg)。尽管其他血流动力学参数如每搏量指数(SVI)、心率(HR)和心脏指数(CI)有显著变化,但PADP或PAPM与LVEDP之间的压力差保持恒定。这些数据表明,左心室功能不全患者在静息和运动时LVEDP升高主要是由于心房收缩增强所致。这种机制排除了肺动脉和左心室之间舒张末期压力平衡。PAPM能够独立于其他血流动力学变量对LVEDP进行最佳估计。