Wood R L, Winkowski T B, Miller J L, Tierney L, Goldman L
Casa Colina Peninsula Rehabilitation Center, Lomita, California 90717.
Brain Inj. 1992 Sep-Oct;6(5):411-8. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008137.
The status of sensory stimulation as a clinical procedure is still in some doubt. Recent papers have shown no significant clinical changes as a result of sensory intervention but this may be due to an inappropriate model on which these procedures were based. This paper outlines the results of a controlled pilot study, based on a sensory regulation model currently being tested at the Casa Colina Peninsula Rehabilitation Center, Los Angeles. The study contrasts the outcome of four patients treated in a sensory regulated environment with four who were exposed to sensory stimulation of an unregulated kind. The results are quite encouraging in favour of a sensory regulation approach.
感觉刺激作为一种临床治疗手段的地位仍存在一定疑问。近期的论文表明，感觉干预并未带来显著的临床变化，但这可能是由于这些治疗手段所基于的模型不合适。本文概述了一项对照性试点研究的结果，该研究基于洛杉矶卡萨科利纳半岛康复中心目前正在测试的感觉调节模型。该研究对比了在感觉调节环境中接受治疗的4名患者与暴露于无规律感觉刺激的4名患者的治疗结果。结果非常有利于支持感觉调节方法。
