• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk language preferred by mothers in considering a hypothetical new vaccine for their children.母亲们在考虑为孩子接种一种假设的新疫苗时所倾向使用的风险表述。
CMAJ. 1992 Oct 1;147(7):1013-7.
2
Pertussis vaccine effectiveness among children 6 to 59 months of age in the United States, 1998-2001.1998 - 2001年美国6至59个月大儿童的百日咳疫苗效力
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2759.
3
How do physicians immunize their own children? Differences among pediatricians and nonpediatricians.医生如何为自己的孩子接种疫苗?儿科医生与非儿科医生之间的差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e623-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0885.
4
Parental attitudes to pre-pubertal HPV vaccination.父母对青春期前HPV疫苗接种的态度。
Vaccine. 2007 Mar 1;25(11):1945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.059. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
5
Perceived parental acceptance-rejection, family-related factors, and socio-economic status of families of adolescent heroin addicts.青少年海洛因成瘾者家庭中父母感知到的接纳与拒绝、家庭相关因素及社会经济地位
Croat Med J. 2003 Apr;44(2):199-206.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons why.对疫苗存疑的父母:哪些疫苗以及存疑原因
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):718-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0538.
8
Son preference in Vietnam.越南的重男轻女现象。
Stud Fam Plann. 1995 Nov-Dec;26(6):325-7.
9
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
10
Attitudes about human papillomavirus vaccine among family physicians.家庭医生对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的态度。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005 Dec;18(6):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2005.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.点(单概率)任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第二部分:一项使数字有意义的系统综述。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255337. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255337. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Taxonomies for synthesizing the evidence on communicating numbers in health: Goals, format, and structure.用于综合健康领域中传达数字证据的分类法:目标、格式和结构。
Risk Anal. 2022 Dec;42(12):2656-2670. doi: 10.1111/risa.13875. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.健康领域中言语概率解释的不精确性和偏好:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3820-3829. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07050-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
What do parents learn by reading a DPT vaccine information form?父母通过阅读百白破疫苗信息表能了解到什么?
Can J Infect Dis. 1994 Mar;5(2):67-74. doi: 10.1155/1994/310719.
6
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.理解风险以及关于治疗偏好的临床风险沟通的经验教训。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...

本文引用的文献

1
Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.癌症患者的信息与参与偏好。
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832.
2
Decision analysis and clinical judgment. A re-evaluation.决策分析与临床判断。重新评估。
Med Decis Making. 1981;1(4):361-89. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8100100406.
3
Informed consent. A study of patient reaction.知情同意。一项关于患者反应的研究。
JAMA. 1971 May 24;216(8):1325-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.216.8.1325.
4
Improving risk communication.
Risk Anal. 1986 Dec;6(4):417-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00954.x.
5
Mental models in risk assessment: informing people about drugs.风险评估中的心理模型:向人们宣传毒品知识。
Risk Anal. 1988 Mar;8(1):147-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01161.x.
6
Perception of teratogenic risk by pregnant women exposed to drugs and chemicals during the first trimester.孕早期接触药物和化学物质的孕妇对致畸风险的认知。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90186-5.
7
Determinants of maternal tolerance of vaccine-related risks.母亲对疫苗相关风险耐受性的决定因素。
Fam Pract. 1992 Mar;9(1):36-41. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.1.36.
8
An appraisal of patients' reactions to "informed consent" for peroral endoscopy.对口内内镜检查“知情同意”患者反应的评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1977 Nov;24(2):69-70. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(77)73453-4.
9
Pertussis vaccine--an analysis of benefits, risks and costs.
N Engl J Med. 1979 Oct 25;301(17):906-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197910253011703.

母亲们在考虑为孩子接种一种假设的新疫苗时所倾向使用的风险表述。

Risk language preferred by mothers in considering a hypothetical new vaccine for their children.

作者信息

Freeman T R, Bass M J

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1992 Oct 1;147(7):1013-7.

PMID:1393896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1336288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the type of risk language preferred by mothers considering the use of hypothetical new vaccine for their children and to compare their choice with what their physicians perceived they would prefer.

DESIGN

Mail survey.

SETTING

Thirteen family practices in southwestern Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with at least one child between the ages of 6 months and 5 years and their physicians.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preferred risk language and physicians' predictions about patient preference.

RESULTS

Of the 226 women sent the questionnaire 208 (92%) responded. Of the 192 who indicated their risk language preference 118 (61%) chose a numeric statement. Of the 11 physicians who answered the question 8 (73%) predicted that their parents would prefer non-numeric statements. Although the women in the study were more likely to be married, were better educated and had higher family incomes than women of the same age in the Ontario population, risk language preference was not found to be related to any of those demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Physicians must be prepared to outline the risks associated with vaccination in both quantitative and qualitative terms.

摘要

目的

确定在考虑为其子女使用假设的新型疫苗时母亲们更喜欢的风险表述类型,并将她们的选择与其医生认为她们会偏好的内容进行比较。

设计

邮寄调查。

地点

安大略省西南部的13个家庭医疗诊所。

参与者

有至少一个年龄在6个月至5岁之间孩子的女性及其医生。

主要观察指标

偏好的风险表述以及医生对患者偏好的预测。

结果

在收到问卷的226名女性中,208名(92%)做出了回应。在192名表明其风险表述偏好的女性中,118名(61%)选择了数字表述。在回答该问题的11名医生中,8名(73%)预测他们的患者家长会更喜欢非数字表述。尽管研究中的女性比安大略省同年龄的女性更有可能已婚、受教育程度更高且家庭收入更高,但未发现风险表述偏好与任何这些人口统计学特征相关。

结论

医生必须准备好以定量和定性的方式概述与疫苗接种相关的风险。