Suppr超能文献

理解风险以及关于治疗偏好的临床风险沟通的经验教训。

Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

作者信息

Edwards A, Elwyn G

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Llanedeyrn Health Centre, Llanedeyrn, Cardiff CF3 7PN, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...

Abstract

This paper defines risk and its component elements and describes where clinical practice may be starting from in terms of what is reported in the literature about understanding risks and the information requirements of consumers. It notes briefly how theoretical models in the literature contribute to our understanding by providing a basis from which to summarise current evidence about the effects of healthcare interventions which address risks and risk behaviour. The situations or types of interventions in which risk related interventions are most effective are described, but a significant caveat is noted about the types of outcomes which have been reported in the literature and which are most appropriate to evaluate. The effects of "framing" variations in the information given to consumers and the ethical dilemmas these raise for a debate about "informed choice" in healthcare programmes are discussed. In response to both the practical and ethical dilemmas that arise from the current evidence, some of the areas where attention should be focused in the future are outlined so that both health gain and informed choice might be achieved. These include the use of decision aids, although their implementation is not widespread at present. Lessons from the current literature on how further progress can be made towards improved communication, discussion between professionals and consumers, and enhancing informed choice are discussed.

摘要

本文定义了风险及其组成要素,并根据文献中关于理解风险和消费者信息需求的报道,描述了临床实践可能的起点。文章简要指出文献中的理论模型如何通过提供一个基础来帮助我们理解,以便总结当前关于应对风险和风险行为的医疗保健干预措施效果的证据。文中描述了与风险相关的干预措施最有效的情况或干预类型,但也指出了文献中报道的、最适合评估的结果类型存在的一个重要警告。讨论了向消费者提供信息时 “框架” 变化的影响以及这些变化给医疗保健项目中 “知情选择” 辩论带来的伦理困境。针对当前证据引发的实际和伦理困境,概述了未来应关注的一些领域,以便既能实现健康收益又能实现知情选择。这些领域包括使用决策辅助工具,尽管目前其应用并不广泛。文中还讨论了从当前文献中汲取的关于如何在改善沟通、专业人员与消费者之间的讨论以及增强知情选择方面取得进一步进展的经验教训。

相似文献

1
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
2
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
3
Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100023...
4
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
5
Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15597226. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100029...
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of cardiovascular disease in Germany: results from GEDA 2022.
J Health Monit. 2025 May 21;10(2):e13126. doi: 10.25646/13126. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Thyroid Cancer Risk Communication in Patients with Thyroid Nodules.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02253-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00115-3.
7
Risky business, healthy lives: how risk perception, risk preferences and information influence consumer's risky health choices.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;22(5):811-831. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01291-3. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
8
Translating Evidence to Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Mov Disord. 2021 Jun;36(6):1293-1307. doi: 10.1002/mds.28599. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9

本文引用的文献

2
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100029...
3
Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100019...
4
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
5
6
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x.
8
Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.
Health Expect. 1998 Jun;1(1):23-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00003.x.
9
The effectiveness of one-to-one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review.
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jul-Sep;20(3):290-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000305.
10
Preconsultation education promoting breast cancer screening: does the choice of media make a difference?
J Cancer Educ. 1998 Fall;13(3):152-61. doi: 10.1080/08858199809528537.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验