Gerken K C, Hodapp A F
Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, Lindquist Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Psychol Rep. 1992 Oct;71(2):659-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.659.
The purpose of this study was to provide data on the validity of using the WPPSI--R with 16 preschoolers who had been referred for psychological assessment. A comparison of the preschoolers' performance on the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M was made. Children ranged in age from 3-0 to 6-0 years, with a mean age of 4-5 yr. The correlations between WPPSI--R and Stanford-Binet L-M scores were strong; WPPSI--R Verbal IQ and Stanford-Binet L-M IQ, r = .85; WPPSI--R Performance IQ and Stanford-Binet L-M IQ, r = .75, and WPPSI--R Full Scale IQ and Stanford-Binet L-M IQ, r = .82. For this very small sample of children whose mean IQ was significantly below average, the WPPSI--R appeared to assess validly their current intellectual functioning. Attention should be given concurrent and predictive validity as well as the efficiency of using the WPPSI--R with other and larger samples of referred children.
本研究的目的是提供关于对16名被转介进行心理评估的学龄前儿童使用韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版（WPPSI--R）有效性的数据。对这些学龄前儿童在韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版和斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M版上的表现进行了比较。儿童年龄范围为3岁0个月至6岁0个月，平均年龄为4岁5个月。韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版与斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M版得分之间的相关性很强；韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版言语智商与斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M版智商，r = 0.85；韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版操作智商与斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M版智商，r = 0.75，以及韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版全量表智商与斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M版智商，r = 0.82。对于这个平均智商显著低于平均水平的非常小的儿童样本，韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版似乎有效地评估了他们当前的智力功能。应该关注韦氏幼儿智力量表修订版在其他更多被转介儿童样本中的同时效度和预测效度以及使用效率。
