• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The selection of cases for randomised trials: a registry survey of concurrent trial and non-trial patients. The British Stomach Cancer Group.随机试验病例的选择:对同期试验患者和非试验患者的登记调查。英国胃癌研究组
Br J Cancer. 1992 Nov;66(5):943-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.390.
2
A controlled, prospective, randomised trial of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy in resectable gastric cancer: interim report. British Stomach Cancer Group.可切除胃癌辅助化疗或放疗的对照、前瞻性、随机试验:中期报告。英国胃癌研究组。
Br J Cancer. 1989 Nov;60(5):739-44. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.350.
3
A randomized trial comparing adjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin with no treatment in operable gastric cancer. International Collaborative Cancer Group.
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Aug;8(8):1362-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1362.
4
[Present status of surgical adjuvant chemotherapy of gastric cancer].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1989 Jun;16(6):2169-72.
5
[Meta-analysis of 10 postoperative adjuvant chemotherapies for gastric cancer in CIH].[中国国际心力衰竭大会(CIH)上10种胃癌术后辅助化疗的荟萃分析]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1994 Aug;21(11):1800-5.
6
Final results of a phase III clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin regimen in resectable gastric cancer.改良氟尿嘧啶、多柔比星和丝裂霉素方案辅助化疗用于可切除胃癌的III期临床试验最终结果
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Nov;13(11):2757-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.11.2757.
7
A randomized trial comparing adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin with no treatment in operable gastric cancer.一项比较辅助性氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和丝裂霉素与不进行治疗对可手术胃癌疗效的随机试验。
Chemotherapy. 1996 May-Jun;42(3):220-6. doi: 10.1159/000239446.
8
Gastric carcinoma: curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.胃癌:根治性切除与辅助化疗
Arch Med Res. 1994 Spring;25(1):29-35.
9
[Perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone in resectable gastroesophageal carcinomas. Results of the MAGIC study].[可切除的胃食管癌围手术期化疗与单纯手术治疗的比较。MAGIC研究结果]
Chirurg. 2006 Dec;77(12):1166-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1249-5.
10
[Adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Experience at the National Institute of Nutrition].[胃癌的辅助化疗。国立营养研究所的经验]
Rev Invest Clin. 1992 Apr-Jun;44(2):221-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study.采用观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果与采用随机试验评估的结果比较:一项meta 流行病学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub3.
2
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比,观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
3
Comparison of survival outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials.比较临床试验内外治疗的癌症患者的生存结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):dju002. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju002. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
Survival effect of first- and second-line treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010.原发性胶质母细胞瘤患者一线和二线治疗的生存效果:一项来自前瞻性登记处的队列研究,1997 - 2010年
Neuro Oncol. 2014 May;16(5):719-27. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not316. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
Does enrollment in cancer trials improve survival?癌症临床试验的参与是否能改善生存?
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):774-80; discussion 780-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.036. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
6
Osteoporosis therapies: evidence from health-care databases and observational population studies.骨质疏松症治疗:来自医疗保健数据库和观察性人群研究的证据。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Nov;87(5):375-84. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9400-1. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
7
Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.参与随机对照试验的患者与接受类似干预但未参与试验的类似患者的结局比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):MR000009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000009.pub4.
8
The rationale for a spine registry.脊柱登记处的基本原理。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S52-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1050-z. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
9
Describing randomisation: patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' practice.描述随机化:患者及公众偏好与临床医生实践的比较
Br J Cancer. 2002 Oct 7;87(8):854-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600527.
10
Recruitment of patients with lung cancer into a randomised clinical trial: experience at two centres. On behalf of the Big Lung Trial Steering Committee.肺癌患者纳入随机临床试验:两个中心的经验。代表大型肺癌试验指导委员会。
Thorax. 2000 Jun;55(6):463-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.6.463.

本文引用的文献

1
CARCINOMA OF THE STOMACH: A 10-YEAR SURVEY OF RESULTS AND OF FACTORS AFFECTING PROGNOSIS.胃癌:结果及影响预后因素的十年调查
Br Med J. 1965 Jun 19;1(5450):1577-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5450.1577.
2
Why data bases should not replace randomized clinical trials.为何数据库不应取代随机临床试验。
Biometrics. 1980 Jun;36(2):337-42.
3
Cancer patient accessions into clinical trials: a pilot investigation into some patient and physician determinants of entry.癌症患者参与临床试验情况:对部分影响患者和医生参与因素的初步调查。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Apr;5(2):227-36. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198204000-00072.
4
Randomised controlled trials: sampling.随机对照试验:抽样
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 May;13(5):631-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01429.x.
5
Accrual of radiotherapy patients to clinical trials.放疗患者纳入临床试验。
Cancer. 1983 Sep 15;52(6):1014-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830915)52:6<1014::aid-cncr2820520614>3.0.co;2-j.
6
Cooperative groups and community hospitals. Measurement of impact in the community hospitals.合作组织与社区医院。社区医院影响的衡量。
Cancer. 1983 Nov 1;52(9):1760-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1760::aid-cncr2820520934>3.0.co;2-r.
7
Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.将随机试验结果应用于临床实践:随机分组前失访的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 10;289(6454):1281-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1281.
8
Using observational data from registries to compare treatments: the fallacy of omnimetrics.利用登记处的观察性数据比较治疗方法:全指标的谬误。
Stat Med. 1984 Oct-Dec;3(4):361-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030413.
9
Cautions on the use of medical databases.
Stat Med. 1983 Jul-Sep;2(3):355-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780020307.
10
An interim report of a prospective, randomized, controlled study of adjuvant chemotherapy in operable gastric cancer: British Stomach Cancer Group.一项关于可手术胃癌辅助化疗的前瞻性、随机、对照研究的中期报告:英国胃癌研究组
World J Surg. 1983 May;7(3):390-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01658089.

随机试验病例的选择:对同期试验患者和非试验患者的登记调查。英国胃癌研究组

The selection of cases for randomised trials: a registry survey of concurrent trial and non-trial patients. The British Stomach Cancer Group.

作者信息

Ward L C, Fielding J W, Dunn J A, Kelly K A

机构信息

Cancer Research Campaign Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1992 Nov;66(5):943-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.390.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.1992.390
PMID:1419641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1977993/
Abstract

A randomised trial of adjuvant chemotherapy vs placebo in operable stomach cancer recruited 249 patients from the West Midlands Region between 1976-1980. A Cancer Registry survey identified a further 1261 suitable concurrent cases. Trial patients were compared with the 960 non-trial cases from participating Districts. Only 493 (51%) non-trial cases passed all of the prospective trial selection criteria for entry. Stage and fitness caused the majority of exclusions and were also highly prognostic. A univariate analysis comparing eligible patients with the trial showed the two groups to be balanced for the significant independent prognostic factors of the trial. However, differences in patient age and the surgery performed indicate that recruitment may have been influenced by unknown selection factors. This survey highlights the difficulty of retrospective selection and confirms the need for randomised controls. Data available from specialist Registries may be used to help develop new protocols and to verify and extend trial results.

摘要

1976年至1980年间,一项关于可手术胃癌辅助化疗与安慰剂对比的随机试验从西米德兰兹地区招募了249名患者。癌症登记调查又确定了另外1261例合适的同期病例。将试验患者与来自参与地区的960例非试验病例进行比较。只有493例(51%)非试验病例通过了所有前瞻性试验入选标准。分期和身体状况导致了大多数排除情况,并且也是高度预后因素。一项将符合条件的患者与试验组进行比较的单因素分析表明,两组在该试验的重要独立预后因素方面是平衡的。然而,患者年龄和所进行的手术存在差异,这表明招募可能受到了未知选择因素的影响。这项调查突出了回顾性选择的困难,并证实了随机对照的必要性。来自专科登记处的可用数据可用于帮助制定新方案,并验证和扩展试验结果。