Morabia A, Markowitz S, Garibaldi K, Wynder E L
American Health Foundation, New York, New York 10017.
Br J Ind Med. 1992 Oct;49(10):721-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.10.721.
The objective of the current study was to estimate the risk of lung cancer attributable to occupational factors and not due to tobacco. At 24 hospitals in nine metropolitan areas in the United States, 1793 male lung cancer cases were matched for race, age, hospital, year of interview, and cigarette smoking (never smoker, ex-smoker, smoker (1-19 and > or = 20 cigarettes per day)) to two types of controls (cancer and non-cancer hospital patients). Information on usual occupation, exposure to specific potential carcinogens, and cigarette smoking was obtained by interview. Risk of lung cancer was increased significantly for electricians; sheetmetal workers and tinsmiths; bookbinders and related printing trade workers; cranemen, derrickmen, and hoistmen; moulders, heat treaters, annealers and other heated metal workers; and construction labourers. All of these occupations are potentially exposed to known carcinogens. Odds ratios (ORs) were increased for exposure to coal dust (adjusted OR = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1-2.1). After stratification, this association was statistically significant only after 10 or more years of exposure. Lung cancer was also related to exposure to asbestos (adjusted OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2). The ORs increased with increasing duration of exposure to asbestos for all smoking categories except for current smokers of 1-19 cigarettes per day. The statistical power to detect ORs among occupations that were previously reported to be at increased risk of lung cancer but that failed to show an OR of at least 1.5 in the current study was small. The cumulative population attributable risk (PAR) of lung cancer due to occupation was 9.2%. It is concluded that occupational factors play an important part in the development of lung cancer independently of cigarette smoking. Because occupations at high risk of lung cancer were under-represented, the cumulative PAR of the present study is likely to be an underestimate of the true contribution of occupation to risk of lung cancer.
本研究的目的是评估归因于职业因素而非烟草的肺癌风险。在美国九个大城市地区的24家医院,1793例男性肺癌病例按种族、年龄、医院、访谈年份和吸烟情况(从不吸烟者、既往吸烟者、吸烟者(每天1 - 19支和≥20支香烟))与两种对照(癌症和非癌症医院患者)进行匹配。通过访谈获取有关通常职业、接触特定潜在致癌物和吸烟的信息。电工、钣金工和白铁工、装订工及相关印刷行业工人、起重机操作员、转臂起重机操作员和卷扬机操作员、铸工、热处理工、退火工及其他热金属工人以及建筑工人的肺癌风险显著增加。所有这些职业都可能接触已知致癌物。接触煤尘的比值比(OR)升高(调整后的OR = 1.5;95%置信区间(95%CI)1.1 - 2.1)。分层后,仅在接触10年或更长时间后,这种关联才具有统计学意义。肺癌还与接触石棉有关(调整后的OR = 1.8;95%CI 1.5 - 2.2)。除了每天吸1 - 19支香烟的当前吸烟者外,所有吸烟类别中,OR随石棉接触时间的增加而升高。在当前研究中,先前报告肺癌风险增加但未显示OR至少为1.5的职业中检测OR的统计效力较小。职业性肺癌的累积人群归因风险(PAR)为9.2%。结论是,职业因素在肺癌发生中独立于吸烟起着重要作用。由于肺癌高风险职业的代表性不足,本研究的累积PAR可能低估了职业对肺癌风险的真正贡献。