Center for Clinical Research, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e71312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071312. eCollection 2013.
Coal is produced across 25 states and provides 42% of US energy. With production expected to increase 7.6% by 2035, proximate populations remain at risk of exposure to carcinogenic coal products such as silica dust and organic compounds. It is unclear if population exposure is associated with increased risk, or even which cancers have been studied in this regard.
We performed a systematic review of English-language manuscripts published since 1980 to determine if coal mining exposure was associated with increased cancer risk (incidence and mortality).
Of 34 studies identified, 27 studied coal mining as an occupational exposure (coal miner cohort or as a retrospective risk factor) but only seven explored health effects in surrounding populations. Overall, risk assessments were reported for 20 cancer site categories, but their results and frequency varied considerably. Incidence and mortality risk assessments were: negative (no increase) for 12 sites; positive for 1 site; and discordant for 7 sites (e.g. lung, gastric). However, 10 sites had only a single study reporting incidence risk (4 sites had none), and 11 sites had only a single study reporting mortality risk (2 sites had none). The ecological study data were particularly meager, reporting assessments for only 9 sites. While mortality assessments were reported for each, 6 had only a single report and only 2 sites had reported incidence assessments.
The reported assessments are too meager, and at times contradictory, to make definitive conclusions about population cancer risk due to coal mining. However, the preponderance of this and other data support many of Hill's criteria for causation. The paucity of data regarding population exposure and risk, the widespread geographical extent of coal mining activity, and the continuing importance of coal for US energy, warrant further studies of population exposure and risk.
煤炭在 25 个州生产,提供了美国 42%的能源。预计到 2035 年,产量将增加 7.6%,因此接近矿区的人口仍然面临接触致癌煤炭产品(如硅尘和有机化合物)的风险。目前尚不清楚人口接触是否与风险增加有关,甚至不清楚在这方面研究了哪些癌症。
我们对自 1980 年以来发表的英语文献进行了系统回顾,以确定煤矿开采暴露是否与癌症风险增加(发病率和死亡率)有关。
在确定的 34 项研究中,有 27 项研究将煤矿开采作为职业暴露(煤矿工人队列或作为回顾性危险因素),但只有 7 项研究探讨了周围人群的健康影响。总体而言,报告了 20 个癌症部位类别的风险评估,但结果和频率差异很大。发病率和死亡率风险评估为:12 个部位为阴性(无增加);1 个部位为阳性;7 个部位为不一致(如肺部、胃部)。然而,有 10 个部位只有一项研究报告发病率风险(4 个部位没有),11 个部位只有一项研究报告死亡率风险(2 个部位没有)。生态研究数据特别匮乏,仅报告了 9 个部位的评估。虽然报告了每个部位的死亡率评估,但有 6 个部位只有一项报告,只有 2 个部位报告了发病率评估。
由于煤矿开采,由于人口癌症风险的报告评估过于稀少,而且有时相互矛盾,无法得出明确的结论。然而,这和其他数据的大多数支持希尔关于因果关系的许多标准。关于人口接触和风险的数据匮乏,煤炭开采活动的广泛地理范围,以及煤炭对美国能源的持续重要性,都需要进一步研究人口接触和风险。