MUDD S, DECOURCY S J
J Bacteriol. 1965 Mar;89(3):874-9. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.3.874-879.1965.
Mudd, Stuart (U.S. Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa.), and Samuel J. DeCourcy, Jr. Interaction of viscid material of Staphylococcus aureus with specific immune serum. J. Bacteriol. 89:874-879. 1965.-Re-examination of the phenomenon of Price and Kneeland and of Wiley revealed the following. (i) The prototype "wound strain" of Wiley, and viscid-colony strains obtained by aging and selection of laboratory or field strains, differed in growth characteristics in liquid and solid media from the Smith encapsulated strain and from ordinary, unselected laboratory and field strains of coagulase-positive staphylococci. (ii) The wound strain and ordinary unselected strains, unlike the Smith encapsulated strain, did not exhibit capsules when examined in thin films of Pelikan Waterproof Drawing Ink. (iii) The phenomenon of Price and Kneeland and of Wiley is exhibited when the wound strain and other viscid-colony strains interact with anti-Wiley immune sera or various human sera. In our experience, this phenomenon was not exhibited by the Smith or by ordinary, unselected strains. (iv) The staphylococcal polysaccharide antigen previously characterized as the capsular substance of a Smith-like strain was completely different chemically and serologically from extracellular material prepared from the Wiley wound strain. We conclude that the viscid-colony strains are not, in fact, encapsulated, and that the phenomenon in question is a precipitation of extracellular material about the periphery of the cells.
马德,斯图尔特(美国宾夕法尼亚州费城退伍军人管理局医院),以及小塞缪尔·J·德库尔西。金黄色葡萄球菌粘性物质与特异性免疫血清的相互作用。《细菌学杂志》89:874 - 879。1965年。——对普赖斯和 Kneeland 以及威利所描述现象的重新研究揭示了以下情况。(i)威利的原型“伤口菌株”,以及通过老化和挑选实验室或野外菌株获得的粘性菌落菌株,在液体和固体培养基中的生长特性与史密斯包膜菌株以及普通的、未经挑选的凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌实验室和野外菌株不同。(ii)与史密斯包膜菌株不同,伤口菌株和普通未经挑选的菌株在用百利金防水绘图墨水薄膜检查时未显示出荚膜。(iii)当伤口菌株和其他粘性菌落菌株与抗威利免疫血清或各种人血清相互作用时,会出现普赖斯和 Kneeland 以及威利所描述的现象。根据我们的经验,史密斯菌株或普通未经挑选的菌株未出现这种现象。(iv)先前被鉴定为类似史密斯菌株荚膜物质的葡萄球菌多糖抗原,在化学和血清学上与从威利伤口菌株制备的细胞外物质完全不同。我们得出结论,粘性菌落菌株实际上并未被包膜,所讨论的现象是细胞外周细胞外物质的沉淀。