• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用视觉显示单元工作后对比敏感度和调节近点。

Contrast sensitivity and the near point of accommodation after work with a visual display unit.

作者信息

Gur S, Ron S

机构信息

Physiology Unit, Occupational Health and Rehabilitation Institute, Loewenstein Hospital, Raanana, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Med Sci. 1992 Aug-Sep;28(8-9):618-21.

PMID:1428820
Abstract

After several hours of work with a visual display unit (VDU), operators become myopic for a short time. Such transient myopia may be evaluated by measuring contrast sensitivity to a modulated grating pattern. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there are any accumulative myopic effects after 1 day of VDU work. We examined grating contrast sensitivity in a group of 13 full-time workers and in 13 office employees who used VDUs only sporadically. The results, which were compared with the near point of accommodation, clearly illustrated that there is no decrease in contrast sensitivity. In the VDU group the decrease in the near point of accommodation was uniformly distributed between zero and 1.0 diopter, whereas among the non-VDU workers 77% of the decrease was between zero and 0.25 diopter. We conclude that the myopic changes in the refractive status of operators after VDU work are not evident in a decrease in contrast sensitivity. However, in VDU workers the dynamic range of accommodation was smaller, suggesting that the visual fatigue and visual stress that developed at work hindered visual activities after work.

摘要

在使用视觉显示单元(VDU)工作数小时后,操作人员会出现短时间近视。这种短暂性近视可通过测量对调制光栅图案的对比敏感度来评估。本研究的目的是确定VDU工作1天后是否存在任何累积性近视效应。我们检查了一组13名全职工作人员以及13名仅偶尔使用VDU的办公室职员的光栅对比敏感度。将结果与调节近点进行比较,结果清楚地表明对比敏感度没有下降。在VDU组中,调节近点的下降均匀分布在0至1.0屈光度之间,而非VDU工作人员中77%的下降在0至0.25屈光度之间。我们得出结论,VDU工作后操作人员屈光状态的近视变化在对比敏感度下降方面并不明显。然而,在VDU工作人员中,调节的动态范围较小,这表明工作时产生的视觉疲劳和视觉压力妨碍了工作后的视觉活动。

相似文献

1
Contrast sensitivity and the near point of accommodation after work with a visual display unit.使用视觉显示单元工作后对比敏感度和调节近点。
Isr J Med Sci. 1992 Aug-Sep;28(8-9):618-21.
2
[Work with visual display units and its effect on the eye].[使用视觉显示单元及其对眼睛的影响]
Klin Oczna. 2007;109(1-3):30-4.
3
Does work with visual display units impair visual activities after work?使用视觉显示设备的工作会在下班后损害视觉活动吗?
Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;79(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00158255.
4
Examination of the near triad in VDU operators.对视频显示终端操作人员近反射三联征的检查。
Ergonomics. 1990 Jun;33(6):787-98. doi: 10.1080/00140139008927185.
5
[Objective evaluation of visual strain in computer screen and office work by recording visually evoked cortical potentials (VECP) and determining changes in contrast sensitivity and refraction].通过记录视觉诱发电位(VECP)并测定对比敏感度和屈光度变化对电脑屏幕视觉疲劳及办公室工作视觉疲劳进行客观评估
Ophthalmologe. 1994 Apr;91(2):160-5.
6
[Evaluation of the visual function in employees working with computers].[对从事计算机工作的员工视觉功能的评估]
Klin Oczna. 2002;104(3-4):257-9.
7
The effect of periocular warming on accommodation.眼周温热对调节的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2005 Jun;112(6):1113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.040.
8
Viewing distance variation and related ophthalmological changes in office activities with and without VDUs.在有和没有视频显示终端的办公活动中观察距离变化及相关眼科变化。
Ergonomics. 1996 May;39(5):719-28. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964493.
9
Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators after moving to an ergonomically designed office landscape.在搬到符合人体工程学设计的办公环境后,VDU操作人员的肌肉骨骼、视觉和心理社会压力。
Appl Ergon. 2008 May;39(3):284-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.005. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
10
Is computer use a risk factor for myopia?使用电脑是导致近视的一个风险因素吗?
J Am Optom Assoc. 1996 Sep;67(9):521-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Nearwork-induced transient myopia: a critical review.近距工作诱发的短暂性近视:一项批判性综述。
Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;91(1):57-85. doi: 10.1007/BF01204624.