• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对慢性病或残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹及父母的社区干预措施:ISEE研究。

A community-based intervention for siblings and parents of children with chronic illness or disability: the ISEE study.

作者信息

Williams Phoebe Dauz, Williams Arthur R, Graff J Carolyn, Hanson Sandra, Stanton Anne, Hafeman Carol, Liebergen Adrienne, Leuenberg Karla, Setter Robyn Karlin, Ridder Lavonne, Curry Heather, Barnard Martha, Sanders Susan

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Nursing; University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2003 Sep;143(3):386-93. doi: 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00391-3.

DOI:10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00391-3
PMID:14517525
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Siblings of children with chronic illness or disability have been reported to have a 1.6 to 2.0 risk for behavioral and mental health problems. Our objective was to examine the effects of an intervention for siblings (age 7-15 years) of children with chronic illness or disability.

METHOD

A randomized, three-group repeated-measures design was used: full intervention (n=79), partial intervention (n=71), and a waiting list control group (n=102). Outcomes were sibling knowledge about illness, behavior problems, social support, self-esteem, attitude, and mood measured over four postintervention periods. Covariates were family cohesion, maternal mood, socioeconomic status, and well sibling age. The full intervention included structured teaching and psychosocial sessions at a 5-day residential summer camp. The partial intervention included camp only. Treatment effects were estimated by using generalized estimating equation panel analyses.

RESULTS

The full treatment group showed significant improvements on all six outcomes over most periods, the partial treatment group on three outcomes, and the control group on two outcomes. Improvements in outcomes ranged from 5% to 25% increases over baseline measures.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose-response relationship to intervention was found. Treatment gains were sustained over a period of 12 months.

摘要

目的

据报道,患有慢性疾病或残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹出现行为和心理健康问题的风险为1.6至2.0。我们的目的是研究针对患有慢性疾病或残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹(7至15岁)进行干预的效果。

方法

采用随机、三组重复测量设计:全面干预组(n = 79)、部分干预组(n = 71)和候补对照组(n = 102)。在干预后的四个阶段测量结果,包括兄弟姐妹对疾病的了解、行为问题、社会支持、自尊、态度和情绪。协变量包括家庭凝聚力、母亲情绪、社会经济地位和健康兄弟姐妹的年龄。全面干预包括在为期5天的住宿夏令营中进行结构化教学和心理社会课程。部分干预仅包括夏令营。通过使用广义估计方程面板分析来估计治疗效果。

结果

在大多数阶段,全面治疗组在所有六个结果上均有显著改善,部分治疗组在三个结果上有改善,对照组在两个结果上有改善。结果的改善幅度比基线测量值增加了5%至25%。

结论

发现干预存在剂量反应关系。治疗效果在12个月内得以维持。

相似文献

1
A community-based intervention for siblings and parents of children with chronic illness or disability: the ISEE study.一项针对慢性病或残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹及父母的社区干预措施:ISEE研究。
J Pediatr. 2003 Sep;143(3):386-93. doi: 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00391-3.
2
Brief report: family-based group intervention for young siblings of children with chronic illness and developmental disability.简短报告:针对患有慢性疾病和发育障碍儿童的年幼兄弟姐妹的家庭式团体干预。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Dec;30(8):678-82. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi054. Epub 2005 Mar 3.
3
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
4
Chronic illness, disability, and mental and social well-being: findings of the Ontario Child Health Study.慢性病、残疾与心理和社会福祉:安大略儿童健康研究的结果
Pediatrics. 1987 May;79(5):805-13.
5
The effectiveness of a peer support camp for siblings of children with cancer.一个针对癌症患儿兄弟姐妹的同伴支持营的效果。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;47(5):580-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20653.
6
Improving the management of family psychosocial problems at low-income children's well-child care visits: the WE CARE Project.改善低收入儿童健康检查中家庭心理社会问题的管理:WE CARE项目。
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):547-58. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0398.
7
Outcomes associated with participation in a therapeutic recreation camping programme for children from 15 European countries: Data from the 'Barretstown Studies'.来自15个欧洲国家的儿童参与治疗性娱乐露营项目的相关结果:“巴雷敦研究”的数据
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(5):903-13. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.010.
8
The psychosocial well-being of children with chronic disease, their parents and siblings: an overview of the research evidence base.患有慢性病儿童及其父母和兄弟姐妹的心理社会福祉:研究证据基础概述。
Child Care Health Dev. 2006 Jan;32(1):19-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00591.x.
9
The mental health of Australian mothers and fathers of young children at risk of disability.面临子女残疾风险的澳大利亚幼儿父母的心理健康状况。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Feb;32(1):53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00166.x.
10
Can a rural community-based work-related activity program make a difference for chronic pain-disabled injured workers?一个基于农村社区的与工作相关的活动项目能否对患有慢性疼痛的残疾受伤工人产生影响?
Aust J Rural Health. 2007 Jun;15(3):166-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00879.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a group intervention to improve mental health in siblings of children with chronic disorders: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项改善慢性疾病患儿兄弟姐妹心理健康的团体干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2025 Jun 1;50(6):443-453. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf021.
2
Assessment of Disease-related Knowledge Among Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and their Family Using IBD-KID2: Evaluating Tool Generalizability.使用IBD-KID2评估炎症性肠病患儿及其家庭中与疾病相关的知识:评估工具的通用性
JPGN Rep. 2021 Jul 12;2(3):e093. doi: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000093. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
The effectiveness of the serious game "Broodles" for siblings of children with intellectual disabilities and/or visual impairment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
《严肃游戏“Broodles”对智力残疾和/或视力障碍儿童的兄弟姐妹的有效性:一项随机对照试验研究方案》。
Trials. 2023 May 17;24(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07358-1.
4
Programs to Prepare Siblings for Future Roles to Support Their Brother or Sister with a Neurodevelopmental Disability: a Scoping Review.帮助兄弟姐妹为未来支持患有神经发育障碍的兄弟或姐妹做好准备的项目:一项范围综述。
Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2023;10(1):47-79. doi: 10.1007/s40474-023-00272-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Psychosocial Interventions and Support Groups for Siblings of Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Conditions: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Sibling Self-reported Mental Health and Wellbeing Outcomes.神经发育障碍患者的兄弟姐妹的心理社会干预和支持小组:对兄弟姐妹自我报告的心理健康和幸福感结果进行的混合方法系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;26(1):143-189. doi: 10.1007/s10567-022-00413-4. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Mental disorders and atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的精神障碍与特应性皮炎
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021 Dec;38(6):1099-1104. doi: 10.5114/ada.2021.112280. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
7
Impact of psoriasis in the quality of life of children, adolescents and their families: a cross-sectional study.银屑病对儿童、青少年及其家庭生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
An Bras Dermatol. 2018 Nov/Dec;93(6):819-823. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20186981.
8
Impact of Well-being Interventions for Siblings of Children and Young People with a Chronic Physical or Mental Health Condition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年慢性生理或心理健康状况的兄弟姐妹的幸福感干预措施的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;21(2):246-265. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0253-x.
9
Sibling Facilitation Mediates the Association Between Older and Younger Sibling Alcohol Use in Late Adolescence.兄弟姐妹间的促进作用介导了青少年晚期年长与年幼兄弟姐妹饮酒行为之间的关联。
J Res Adolesc. 2015 Dec 1;25(4):638-651. doi: 10.1111/jora.12154. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Intervention and support for siblings of youth with developmental disabilities: a systematic review.发育障碍青年兄弟姐妹的干预和支持:系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2015 Mar;18(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10567-014-0175-1.