Fisher B E, Sullivan K J
Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 Autumn;8(3):31-44. doi: 10.1310/B3JD-NML4-V1FB-5YHG.
Over the last several years, there has been increasing recognition of the potential for central nervous system (CNS) recovery after brain damage. One commonality across the recovery and brain plasticity literature is that practice induces plastic, dynamic changes in the CNS. However, more than simply repetition, it is the manipulation of specific practice variables that appears to drive these dynamic processes in the CNS. The experimental manipulations used in the studies on neuroplasticity largely derive from the concept that in the undamaged or healthy brain neuronal connections and cortical maps are continuously remodeled by experience and by the performance of specific, intensive, and complex movements used to solve motor problems and attain goals. Intervention designed to promote recovery rather than compensation after stroke would then manipulate these same practice variables that have consistently promoted behavioral recovery and neuroplasticity in laboratory settings. Three current intervention strategies that incorporate these practice variables are reviewed. Preliminary results provide evidence that manipulation of task intensity and specificity and the sensorimotor experience of the task training are the necessary ingredients for maximizing the tremendous potential for recovery in patients with stroke.
