• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应的局部情境对人类因果判断的影响。

Effect of local context of responding on human judgment of causality.

作者信息

Reed P

机构信息

University of Sussex, Brighton, England.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):573-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03199589.

DOI:10.3758/bf03199589
PMID:1453974
Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of various relationships between a response (pressing the space bar of a computer) and an outcome (a triangle flashing on a screen) on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response. In Experiment 1, when responses were required to be temporarily isolated from each other prior to an outcome, ratings of the causal effectiveness of the responses were higher than in a condition in which the probability of an outcome following a response was the same but in which no temporal isolation was required. In Experiment 2, when a number of responses were required to be emitted temporally close to the outcome, ratings of the causal effectiveness of the responses were lower than in a condition in which the probability of an outcome following a response was the same but in which no temporal proximity was required. These results suggest that, in addition to the overall probability that an outcome will follow a response, the local context of responding at the time an outcome is presented is critical in influencing ratings of causal effectiveness.

摘要

两项实验研究了一种反应(按下电脑空格键)与一种结果(屏幕上闪烁一个三角形)之间的各种关系对反应因果效力判断的影响。在实验1中,当要求反应在结果出现之前暂时相互隔离时,对反应因果效力的评分高于这样一种情况:即反应后出现结果的概率相同,但不要求时间隔离。在实验2中,当要求多个反应在时间上接近结果发出时,对反应因果效力的评分低于这样一种情况:即反应后出现结果的概率相同,但不要求时间接近。这些结果表明,除了结果跟随反应出现的总体概率外,结果呈现时反应的局部背景对于影响因果效力评分至关重要。

相似文献

1
Effect of local context of responding on human judgment of causality.反应的局部情境对人类因果判断的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):573-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03199589.
2
Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.
Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):243-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03208895.
3
Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.
Learn Behav. 2003 May;31(2):205-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03195983.
4
Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jul;27(3):187-95.
5
Human causality detection and judgment with unsignaled and signaled delayed outcomes.人类对无信号和有信号延迟结果的因果关系检测和判断。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2024 Jul;50(3):210-224. doi: 10.1037/xan0000382.
6
Generalization of causal efficacy judgments after evaluative learning.评价性学习后因果效力判断的泛化
Learn Behav. 2009 Nov;37(4):336-48. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.4.336.
7
Neural correlates of causality judgment in physical and social context--the reversed effects of space and time.物理和社会情境中因果判断的神经关联——空间和时间的反向效应。
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 1;63(2):882-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
8
Role of a stimulus filling an action-outcome delay in human judgments of causal effectiveness.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Jan;25(1):92-102.
9
Differences and commonalities in the judgment of causality in physical and social contexts: an fMRI study.物理和社会语境中因果判断的差异和共性:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
10
Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: spontaneous reports and ratings.动画运动中感知到的物理和社会因果关系:自发报告与评分
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):112-43. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Context and time in causal learning: contingency and mood dependent effects.因果学习中的情境和时间:关联和情绪依赖效应。
PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e64063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064063. Print 2013.
2
Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.在采用自由操作强化程序进行条件作用后,评价功能转移的多个决定因素。
Learn Behav. 2010 Nov;38(4):348-66. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.4.348.
3
Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.

本文引用的文献

1
A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.
Mem Cognit. 1980 Sep;8(5):459-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03211142.
2
The display of information and the judgment of contingency.
Can J Psychol. 1965 Sep;19(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/h0082908.
3
Marking effects in instrumental performance on DRH schedules.在固定比率强化(DRH)时间表下工具性表现中的标记效应。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1989 Nov;41(4):337-53.
4
Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):243-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03208895.
Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
Mem Cognit. 1990 Sep;18(5):537-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03198486.
5
Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity.在行动-结果偶然性和接近性变化下的工具性判断与表现。
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):353-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03197139.
6
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?抑郁和非抑郁学生的偶然性判断:越悲伤越明智?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Dec;108(4):441-85. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441.