• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.

作者信息

Shaklee H, Tucker D

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1980 Sep;8(5):459-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03211142.

DOI:10.3758/bf03211142
PMID:7442548
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.
Mem Cognit. 1980 Sep;8(5):459-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03211142.
2
Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.受权力驱动？探究问题及呈现形式对因果判断的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1482-94. doi: 10.1037/a0013509.
3
Note on the rationality of rule-based versus exemplar-based processing in human judgment.关于人类判断中基于规则与基于范例的处理方式的合理性说明。
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Feb;45(1):37-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00376.x.
4
Relationship between students' self-assessment of their capabilities and their teachers' judgments of students' capabilities in mathematics problem-solving.学生对自身数学解题能力的自我评估与教师对学生数学解题能力的判断之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2006 Jun;98(3):765-78. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.3.765-778.
5
Strategy changes in human contingency judgments as a function of contingency tables.
J Gen Psychol. 1991 Oct;118(4):349-60. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1991.9917796.
6
The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.时间投入元认知调节的递减标准模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1349-68. doi: 10.1037/a0035098. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
7
Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.自然样本空间与不确定信念。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Nov;63(5):766-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.5.766.
8
Response bias in psychophysical judgments: a test of Luce's model.
J Gen Psychol. 1962 Oct;67:283-9. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1962.9711556.
9
Selectional processes in causality judgment.因果判断中的选择过程。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):27-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03199554.
10
The equivalence of contingency structure for intuitive covariation judgments about height, weight, and body fat.关于身高、体重和体脂的直观协变判断中偶然结构的等效性。
J Psychol. 2000 May;134(3):325-35. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600872.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-truncated sampling produces more moderate covariation judgment and related decision than descriptive frequency information: The role of regressive frequency estimation.自截断采样比描述性频率信息产生更适中的共变判断和相关决策：回归频率估计的作用。
Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):201-215. doi: 10.1002/pchj.703. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
2
The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.数量素养和呈现形式对关联判断的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):389-399. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01084-8.
3
Perception of Interannual Covariation and Strategies for Risk Reduction among Mikea of Madagascar : Individual and Social Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES.反应与结果之间的偶然性判断
Psychol Monogr. 1965;79:SUPPL 1:1-17. doi: 10.1037/h0093874.
2
The display of information and the judgment of contingency.
Can J Psychol. 1965 Sep;19(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/h0082908.
3
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?抑郁和非抑郁学生的偶然性判断：越悲伤越明智？
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Dec;108(4):441-85. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441.
马达加斯加米凯亚人对年际协变的认知及降低风险的策略：个体学习与社会学习
Hum Nat. 2007 Jun;18(2):162-80. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007-9007-z. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
4
On the origin of personal causal theories.个人因果理论的起源。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):83-104. doi: 10.3758/BF03214413.
5
The effects of problem content and scientific background on information search and the assessment and valuation of correlations.问题内容和科学背景对信息搜索以及相关性的评估和评估的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jan;39(1):107-16. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0008-5.
6
Framing effects in inference tasks--and why they are normatively defensible.推理任务中的框架效应——以及它们在规范上为何合理。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep;32(6):874-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03196866.
7
Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment.因果判断中的瞬间与综合反应策略
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1138-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03194331.
8
How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments.时间假设如何影响因果判断。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1128-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03194330.
9
Judging response-outcome relations: the role of response-outcome contingency, outcome probability, and method of information presentation.
Mem Cognit. 1984 May;12(3):270-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03197676.
10
Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
Mem Cognit. 1990 Sep;18(5):537-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03198486.